Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Springer full text link Springer
Full text links

Actions

.2021 Apr 16;27(3):28.
doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00289-7.

Enhancing Engineering Ethics: Role Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility

Affiliations

Enhancing Engineering Ethics: Role Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility

Nicole M Smith et al. Sci Eng Ethics..

Abstract

Engineering ethics calls the attention of engineers to professional codes of ethical responsibility and personal values, but the practice of ethics in corporate settings can be more complex than either of these. Corporations too have cultures that often include corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices and policies, but few discussions of engineering ethics make any explicit reference to CSR. This article proposes critical attention to CSR and role ethics as an opportunity to help prepare engineers to think through the ethics of their professional practice. After a brief overview of the evolution of social responsibility within engineering ethics in the United States, this article shares empirical research with practicing engineers in the mining and energy industries to explore how their formal ethics training did and did not prepare them to grapple with the ethical dimensions of their professional practice. It then illustrates the ways in which these dilemmas and the strategies employed for navigating them are framed within CSR policies and practices and resonate more strongly with role ethics rather than ethical theory as currently taught in most US engineering programs. The article concludes that engineering ethics teaching and learning would benefit from explicitly incorporating critical discussions of role ethics and CSR.

Keywords: Corporate social responsibility; Engineering education; Engineering ethics; Extractive industries; Role ethics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ames, R. T. (2011). Confucian role ethics: A vocabulary. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.
    1. Basart, J. M., & Serra, M. (2013). Engineering ethics beyond engineers’ ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(1), 179–187.
    1. Blowfield, M., & Frynas, G. (2005). Setting new agendas: critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world. International Affairs, 81(3), 499–513.
    1. Blowfield, M., & Murray, A. (2014). Corporate responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    1. Carroll, A. B. (1993). Business and society: ethics and stakeholder management (2nd ed.). Cincinatti: South-western publishing.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Springer full text link Springer
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp