Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2018 Dec;128(616):3210-3241.
doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12557. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

Trade and Geography in the Spread of Islam

Affiliations

Trade and Geography in the Spread of Islam

Stelios Michalopoulos et al. Econ J (London).2018 Dec.

Abstract

In this study we explore the historical determinants of contemporary Muslim representation. Motivated by a plethora of case studies and historical accounts among Islamicists stressing the role of trade for the adoption of Islam, we construct detailed data on pre-Islamic trade routes, harbors, and ports to determine the empirical regularity of this argument. Our analysis - conducted across countries and across ethnic groups within countries - establishes that proximity to the pre-600 CE trade network is a robust predictor of today's Muslim adherence in the Old World. We also show that Islam spread successfully in regions that are ecologically similar to the birthplace of the religion, the Arabian Peninsula. Namely, territories characterized by a large share of arid and semiarid regions dotted with few pockets of fertile land are more likely to host Muslim communities. We discuss the various mechanisms that may give rise to the observed pattern.

Keywords: Geographic Inequality; Geography; Islam; Religion; Trade Routes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1 –
Figure 1 –. Muslim Adherence and Ancient Trade Routes – Selected Countries
Figure 1 portrays Muslim adherence at the ethnic group level and historical trade routes within five countries (1a: China, 1b: Mali, 1c: Tanzania, 1d: Indonesia and 1e: India). Muslim adherence is represented in quintiles at the level of ethnic group, where actual homelands are from the Ethnologue version 15 and data on religious affiliation from the World Religion Database. Darker shades represent higher Muslim shares in the population. In Figures 1a, 1c, and 1e the trade routes are depicted as thick, black-and-white dashed lines and correspond to pre-600 CE. These routes are digitized from Brice and Kennedy (2001). The ancient ports and harbors, depicted as circled stars, are from Arthur de Graauw (2014). In figure 1b trade routes are relative to 900 AD, while in figures 1c and 1d ports in year 600 CE (1800 CE) are represented with circled stars (circled dots). Country borders are represented with a thin dashed grey line.
Figure 1 –
Figure 1 –. Muslim Adherence and Ancient Trade Routes – Selected Countries
Figure 1 portrays Muslim adherence at the ethnic group level and historical trade routes within five countries (1a: China, 1b: Mali, 1c: Tanzania, 1d: Indonesia and 1e: India). Muslim adherence is represented in quintiles at the level of ethnic group, where actual homelands are from the Ethnologue version 15 and data on religious affiliation from the World Religion Database. Darker shades represent higher Muslim shares in the population. In Figures 1a, 1c, and 1e the trade routes are depicted as thick, black-and-white dashed lines and correspond to pre-600 CE. These routes are digitized from Brice and Kennedy (2001). The ancient ports and harbors, depicted as circled stars, are from Arthur de Graauw (2014). In figure 1b trade routes are relative to 900 AD, while in figures 1c and 1d ports in year 600 CE (1800 CE) are represented with circled stars (circled dots). Country borders are represented with a thin dashed grey line.
Figure 2 –
Figure 2 –. Main Old World trade routes
Figure 2a (2b) shows the Old World network of Roman roads (from the Barrington Atlas), ancient ports and harbours (from Arthur de Graauw, 2014) and trade routes (from Brice and Kennedy, 2001) in 600 AD (1800 AD).
Figure 3 –
Figure 3 –. Non-parametric conditional correlation – Cross-country
Figure 4 –
Figure 4 –. Non-parametric conditional correlation – Cross-ethnic group
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Acemoglu D, Johnson S, and Robinson JA (2001): “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation,” American Economie Review, 91(5), 1369–1401.
    1. Acemoglu D, Johnson S, and Robinson JA (2002): “Reversal Of Fortune: Geography And Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution,” Quarterly Journal of Economies, 107(4), 1231–1294.
    1. Andaya B, and Andaya L (1982): A History of Malaysia. Macmillan, London.
    1. Barrett DB, Kurian GT, and Johnson TM (2001): World Christian Encyclopedia, 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    1. Barro R, and Mccleary RM (2003): “Religion and Economie Growth Across Countries,” American Sociological Review, 68(5), 760–781.

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2026 Movatter.jp