Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Public Library of Science full text link Public Library of Science Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2020 Jul 23;15(7):e0235742.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235742. eCollection 2020.

Vessel noise affects routine swimming and escape response of a coral reef fish

Affiliations

Vessel noise affects routine swimming and escape response of a coral reef fish

Laura Velasquez Jimenez et al. PLoS One..

Abstract

An increasing number of studies have shown that anthropogenic noise can negatively affect aspects of the anti-predator behaviour of reef fishes, potentially affecting fitness and survival. However, it has been suggested that effects could differ among noise sources. The present study compared two common sources of anthropogenic noise and investigated its effects on behavioural traits critical for fish survival. In a tank-based experiment we examined the effects of noise from 4-stroke motorboats and ships (bulk carriers > 50,000 tonnes) on the routine swimming and escape response of a coral reef fish, the whitetail damselfish (Pomacentrus chrysurus). Both 4-stroke boat and ship noise playbacks affected the fast-start response and routine swimming of whitetail damselfish, however the magnitude of the effects differed. Fish exposed to ship noise moved shorter distances and responded more slowly (higher response latency) to the startle stimulus compared to individuals under the 4-stroke noise treatment. Our study suggests that 4-stroke and ship noise can affect activity and escape response of individuals to a simulated predation threat, potentially compromising their anti-predator behaviour.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Schematic of the experimental set up.
Experimental arena for analysis of routine swimming and escape response ofPomacentrus chrysurus. Electromagnet (A), tapered weight (B), opaque white container (C), LED lights (D), experimental arena (E), base of the experimental arena (F), J9 speaker (G), mirror (H), camera (I) and image projected from the mirror (J).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Experimental timeline.
Each individual was placed in the experimental arena for nine minutes to acclimate. The routine swimming was recorded one minute before and one minute after the beginning of the sound treatment (ambient playback, 4-stroke noise playback, or ship noise playback). After recording routine swimming, a stimulus was released, and the fast-start escape response recorded.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Power spectral densities (PSD) of acoustic treatments.
Power spectral densities of (A) field and (B) playback of acoustic treatments. Mean PSD values were calculated from three individual samples of each noise source (Window type: 1 s Hamming, 50% overlap, frequency resolution of 1Hz). Duration of ambient, ship and 4-stroke boat playback samples for the sound analysis were approximately 30, 8 and 30 s.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Canonical discriminant analysis.
Canonical discriminant analysis displaying how the playback of noise from ships, 4-stroke powered motorboats and ambient affected the routine swimming (red line) and escape response (blue line) of juvenilePomacentrus chrysurus. A canonical discriminant analysis displays the difference in routine swimming and escape response variables among acoustic treatments. The direction and importance of trends are indicated by the direction and the length of the vectors representing the original variables.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Effect of exposure to noise playbacks on routine swimming and escape response variables ofPomacentrus chrysurus.
(A) Mean latency (± SE), (B) Change (mean ± SE) in distance covered between 56 s pre- and post-treatment. Data for latency were natural log transformed for analysis and standardised for distance to stimulus for analysis, but back-transformed covariate data are plotted. Asterisks above or below the bars represent significant differences between the planned comparisons (* = p<0.05; ns = no significant).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hildebrand J.A. Anthropogenic and natural sources of ambient noise in the ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2009; 395: 5–20. 10.3354/meps08353 - DOI
    1. Slabbekoorn H, Bouton N, van Opzeeland I, Coers A, ten Care C, Popper AN. A noisy spring: the impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010; 25: 419–427. 10.1016/j.tree.2010.04.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Todd V. Mitigation of underwater anthropogenic noise and marine mammals: the ‘death of a thousand’ cuts and/or mundane adjustment? Mar Pollut Bull. 2016; 102: 1–3. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.11.059 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Small C, Nicholls RJ. A global analysis of human settlement in coastal zones. J Coast Res. 2003; 19: 584–599.
    1. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. Great Barrier Reef Outlook Report 2014. 2019 Feb 1 [Cited 2019 July 1]http://elibrary.gbrmpa.gov.au/jspui/handle/11017/2855

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Public Library of Science full text link Public Library of Science Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp