Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Atypon full text link Atypon Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2020 Feb 5;6(6):eaay3922.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay3922. eCollection 2020 Feb.

12,000-Year-old Aboriginal rock art from the Kimberley region, Western Australia

Affiliations

12,000-Year-old Aboriginal rock art from the Kimberley region, Western Australia

Damien Finch et al. Sci Adv..

Abstract

The Kimberley region in Western Australia hosts one of the world's most substantial bodies of indigenous rock art thought to extend in a series of stylistic or iconographic phases from the present day back into the Pleistocene. As with other rock art worldwide, the older styles have proven notoriously difficult to date quantitatively, requiring new scientific approaches. Here, we present the radiocarbon ages of 24 mud wasp nests that were either over or under pigment from 21 anthropomorphic motifs of the Gwion style (previously referred to as "Bradshaws") from the middle of the relative stylistic sequence. We demonstrate that while one date suggests a minimum age of c. 17 ka for one motif, most of the dates support a hypothesis that these Gwion paintings were produced in a relatively narrow period around 12,000 years ago.

Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Mud wasp nest samples and their development sequence.
(A) A recently constructedSceliphron laetum mud wasp nest. (B) Underside of the nest after removal from the rock surface with basal nest structure highlighted to show (C) the characteristic oval shape evident in weathered nests, leaving (D) just a remnant of mineralized mud over time. (E) A typical remnant mud wasp nest (DR006_03-1) overlying pigment from a Gwion motif before removal and (F) the remainder with pigment revealed underneath. Photo credit: Damien Finch.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Summary of Gwion-related ages.
Calibrated dates for the oldest wasp nests and the associated reliability score (10 is the most reliable, and 1 is the least). The bar underneath each probability distribution plot indicates the 95% probability range, with the median marked with a cross. The minimum age constraints provided by overlying nests (indicated with blue bars, starting just beyond the 95% probability range for the nest) and the maximum age constraints from underlying nests (brown bars) together with the age bracket for DR015_07 suggest a narrow age range for production of most of these Gwion motifs around 12,400 years ago (cal B.P.) (red vertical bar), apart from DR013_10-1 and DR006_03-1.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Hypothetical ages of nests overlying (blue triangles) and underlying (brown triangles) motifs.
Blue (brown) horizontal bars show the possible age range for the associated motif over (under) the nest. Scenario 1 (A): All motifs were painted in a short period permitting no major overlap between the ages of underlying and overlying nests. Scenario 2 (B): Motifs were painted between 2000 and 4000 years ago so the ages of underlying and overlying nests will overlap significantly. The probability functions in (C) and (D) are the sum of the possible age ranges for motifs from overlying (blue curve) and underlying (brown curve) nests.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Motif age ranges.
Calibrated dates for the oldest wasp nests with a reliability score of at least 5. (A) Nest over motif: Nest sample locations are indicated in blue on the black figures. (B) Nest under motif: Nest sample locations are indicated in brown. (C) Nests under and over the same motif DR015_07 and the calculated age bracket for motif DR015_07 using the OxCal 4.3.2 software (36,40) and the code listed in text S1. Illustrations: Pauline Heaney.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Probability distributions for the age constraints for Gwion motifs.
Sum of the cumulative probability density functions for the ages of nests over (blue) and under (brown) pigment and the age bracket for motif DR015_07 (red). The intersection of the blue and brown areas then represents the probability distribution for the age of Gwion motifs. The outliers, DR013_10 and DR006_03, are included.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Hypothesized age range for the Gwion style (top graph), with (dark gray) and without (light gray) a correction for inbuilt charcoal age.
Excluding the two possible outlier dates for DR013_10 and DR006_03, the Gwion style is defined temporally by combining the age distributions for the oldest over-art nest (DT1207_03), the youngest under-art nest (DR013_06), and the age bracket for DR015_07. The bar under the curve is the 95% probability range, and the cross marks the median of the corrected distribution. Modeled using OxCal v4.3.2 (40); r:5 SHCal13 atmospheric curve (35) and the code listed in text S1.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aubert M., Brumm A., Taçon P. S. C., The timing and nature of human colonization of southeast asia in the late pleistocene: A rock art perspective. Curr. Anthropol. 58, S553–S566 (2017).
    1. Jones T., Levchenko V. A., King P. L., Troitzsch U., Wesley D., Williams A. A., Nayingull A., Radiocarbon age constraints for a Pleistocene–Holocene transition rock art style: The Northern Running Figures of the East Alligator River region, western Arnhem Land, Australia. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 11, 80–89 (2017).
    1. Bednarik R. G., First dating of Pilbara petroglyphs. Rec. Western Aust. Mus. 20, 415–429 (2002).
    1. Pike A. W., Hoffmann D. L., García-Diez M., Pettitt P. B., Alcolea J., De Balbín R., González-Sainz C., de las Heras C., Lasheras J. A., Montes R., Zilhão J., U-series dating of Paleolithic art in 11 caves in Spain. Science 336, 1409–1413 (2012). - PubMed
    1. David B., Geneste J.-M., Petchey F., Delannoy J.-J., Barker B., Eccleston M., How old are Australia’s pictographs? A review of rock art dating. J. Archaeol. Sci. 40, 3–10 (2013).

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Atypon full text link Atypon Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp