Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

Review
.2020 May 10:321:1-22.
doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.01.057. Epub 2020 Feb 3.

Advances and limitations of drug delivery systems formulated as eye drops

Affiliations
Review

Advances and limitations of drug delivery systems formulated as eye drops

Clotilde Jumelle et al. J Control Release..

Abstract

Topical instillation of eye drops remains the most common and easiest route of ocular drug administration, representing the treatment of choice for many ocular diseases. Nevertheless, low ocular bioavailability of topically applied drug molecules can considerably limit their efficacy. Over the last several decades, numerous drug delivery systems (DDS) have been developed in order to improve drug bioavailability on the ocular surfaces. This review systematically covers the most recent advances of DDS applicable by topical instillation, that have shown better performance in in vivo models compared to standard eye drop formulations. These delivery systems are based on in situ forming gels, nanoparticles and combinations of both. Most of the DDS have been developed using natural or synthetic polymers. Polymers offer many advantageous properties for designing advanced DDS including biocompatibility, gelation properties and/or mucoadhesiveness. However, despite the high number of studies published over the last decade, there are several limitations for clinical translation of DDS. This review article focuses on the recent advances for the development of ocular drug delivery systems. In addtion, the potential challenges for commercialization of new DDS are presented.

Keywords: Eye drop; Gel; Microparticle; Nanoparticle; Ocular drug delivery; Ocular surface.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Main static and dynamic barriers for ocular drug delivery.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.. Principle of ‘sol-gel transition’ of different types ofin situ gel used for ocular drug delivery.
(A) Schematic principle of sol-gel transition of different types of stimuli-responsive materials. Images of sol-gel transition of thermo-responsive PNIPAAm (from [17]) (B) and ion-responsive gellan gum (C) (from [18]).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.. Sustained drug release and improved therapeutic effect by usingin situ gels compared with conventional eye drops.
(A) Cumulative amount of pilocarpine released as a function of time from various pilocarpine-containing solutions. All measurements were performed in triplicate, and the standard deviations were all within 3% (From [40]). (B) Decrease in pupil diameter vs time profiles for various pilocarpine-containing solutions. All the measurements were performed in triplicate (From [40]). (C) Thermosensitive PNIPAAm–CS synthesis outline. (D) Morphology change of the PNIPAAm–CS gel forming solution below and upon LCST by using an optical microscope. Scale bar, 20 μm. (E) Timolol maleate concentration in aqueous humor after instillation of 0.5% timolol maleate conventional and thermosensitive PNIPAAm–CS gel forming solution (n=5) (From [43]). (F) The IOP-lowering effect of timolol maleate in thermosensitive PNIPAAm–CS and conventional eye drop (n=4) (From [43]).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.. Increased drug retention by using poly(lactic acid) (PLA)-based nanoparticle systems.
(A) Schematic of PLA-Dextran NPs the for the delivery of cyclosporin A (From [127]). (B) Images of rabbit eyes treated with free indocyanine green (ICG), NP–ICG (− PBA), and NP–ICG (+ PBA) obtained with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, (λex = 795 nm and λem = 810 nm). (C) Schematic of PLA-PMA-PBA NPs the for the delivery of cyclosporin A. (D) Slit lamp, fluorescence, and OCT images for LMP-0 (A,E,I), LMP-10 (B,F,J), LMP-30 (C,G,K), and negative control (D,H,L).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.. Increased drug retention and therapeutic effect using chitosan for the development of polymeric/lipidic NPs.
(A) Schematic illustration of differently charged lipidic NPs carriers containing dexamethasone (From [105]). (B) The concentration–time curves of timolol (TM) in rabbit tears following topical administration of TM eye drops and liposomes with or without chitosan (CH) (mean ± SD, n = 3) (From [106]). (C) Percentage decrease in intraocular pressure (IOP) after administration of methazolamide solution, methazolamide-SLNs (solid lipids NPs), methazolamide-chitosan-SLNs, commercial eye drops and physical saline solution. (mean ± SD, n = 6) (From [104]).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.. Increased corneal retention and sustained release of drugs by combiningin situ gels and NPs.
(A) Dynamic gamma scintigraphy study showing percentage radioactivity remaining on cornea with time (blue-diamond shape) marketed, (green triangle shape) chitosanin situ gel, (red-square shape) nanosuspension, (purple-circle shape) nanoparticle ladenin situ gel (From [134]).(B) Concentration of ketarolac in aqueous humor of rabbit eyes with time from the nanodispersion (E2) andin situ gel incorporated with E2 (NG2) compared to Acular® eye drops (From [137]).(C) The difference of IOP between two eyes (i.e. IOP lowering effect) for (a) linear PNIPAAm eye drops; and (b) linear PNIPAAm and nanoparticles mixture eye drops (From [23]).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Awwad S, Ahmed AHAM, Sharma G, Heng JS, Khaw PT, Brocchini S, et al. Principles of pharmacology in the eye. British Journal of Pharmacology 2017. 10.1111/bph.14024. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gause S, Hsu K-H, Shafor C, Dixon P, Powell KC, Chauhan A. Mechanistic modeling of ophthalmic drug delivery to the anterior chamber by eye drops and contact lenses. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2016;233:139–54. 10.1016/j.cis.2015.08.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ghate D, Edelhauser HF. Ocular drug delivery. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery 2006;3:275–87. 10.1517/17425247.3.2.275. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Imperiale JC, Acosta GB, Sosnik A. Polymer-based carriers for ophthalmic drug delivery. J Control Release 2018;285:106–41. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.06.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Worakul N, Robinson JR. Ocular pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 1997;44:71–83. 10.1016/S0939-6411(97)00064-7. - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp