Restoration Scaling Approaches to Addressing Ecological Injury: The Habitat-Based Resource Equivalency Method
- PMID:31915910
- PMCID: PMC7007898
- DOI: 10.1007/s00267-019-01245-9
Restoration Scaling Approaches to Addressing Ecological Injury: The Habitat-Based Resource Equivalency Method
Abstract
Natural resource trustee agencies must determine how much, and what type of environmental restoration will compensate for injuries to natural resources that result from releases of hazardous substances or oil spills. To fulfill this need, trustees, and other natural resource damage assessment (NRDA) practitioners have relied on a variety of approaches, including habitat equivalency analysis (HEA) and resource equivalency analysis (REA). The purpose of this paper is to introduce the Habitat-Based Resource Equivalency Method (HaBREM), which integrates REA's reproducible injury metrics and population modeling with HEA's comprehensive habitat approach to restoration. HaBREM is intended to evaluate injury and restoration using organisms that use the habitat to represent ecological habitat functions. This paper seeks to expand and refine the use of organism-based metrics (biomass-based REA), providing an opportunity to integrate sublethal injuries to multiple species, as well as the potential to include error rates for injury and restoration parameters. Applied by NRDA practitioners in the appropriate context, this methodology can establish the relationship between benefits of compensatory restoration projects and injuries to plant or animal species within an affected habitat. HaBREM may be most effective where there are appropriate data supporting the linkage between habitat and species gains (particularly regionally specific habitat information), as well as species-specific monitoring data and predictions on the growth, density, productivity (i.e., rate of generation of biomass or individuals), and age distributions of indicator species.
Keywords: Ecological injury; Habitat; Natural Resource Damage Assessment; Restoration scaling.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures









Similar articles
- Ecosystem-Service Scaling Techniques to Evaluate the Benefits of Marine Debris Removal.Domanski A, Laverty AL.Domanski A, et al.Environ Manage. 2022 Jul;70(1):64-78. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01636-5. Epub 2022 Apr 1.Environ Manage. 2022.PMID:35359239
- Natural resource damage assessment for the Hebei Spirit oil spill: An application of Habitat Equivalency Analysis.Kim TG, Opaluch J, Moon DS, Petrolia DR.Kim TG, et al.Mar Pollut Bull. 2017 Aug 15;121(1-2):183-191. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.05.064. Epub 2017 Jun 7.Mar Pollut Bull. 2017.PMID:28601437
- Lost ecosystem services as a measure of oil spill damages: a conceptual analysis of the importance of baselines.Kennedy CJ, Cheong SM.Kennedy CJ, et al.J Environ Manage. 2013 Oct 15;128:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.035. Epub 2013 May 25.J Environ Manage. 2013.PMID:23712057
- Integrating long-term stewardship goals into the remediation process: natural resource damages and the Department of Energy.Burger J, Gochfeld M, Powers CW.Burger J, et al.J Environ Manage. 2007 Jan;82(2):189-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.12.012. Epub 2006 Mar 22.J Environ Manage. 2007.PMID:16554118Review.
- Practical proxies for tidal marsh ecosystem services: application to injury and restoration.Peterson CH, Able KW, Dejong CF, Piehler MF, Simenstad CA, Zedler JB.Peterson CH, et al.Adv Mar Biol. 2008;54:221-66. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2881(08)00004-7.Adv Mar Biol. 2008.PMID:18929066Review.
Cited by
- Meta-analysis of salt marsh vegetation impacts and recovery: a synthesis following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.Zengel S, Weaver J, Mendelssohn IA, Graham SA, Lin Q, Hester MW, Willis JM, Silliman BR, Fleeger JW, McClenachan G, Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Hughes AR, Cebrian J, Deis DR, Rutherford N, Roberts BJ.Zengel S, et al.Ecol Appl. 2022 Jan;32(1):e02489. doi: 10.1002/eap.2489. Epub 2021 Dec 8.Ecol Appl. 2022.PMID:34741358Free PMC article.
References
- Adamowicz WL, Boxall PC, Louviere JJ, Swait J, Williams M. Stated-preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. In: Bateman I, Willis K, editors. Valuing environmental preferences: theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU, and developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001. pp. 460–479.
- Ando A, Madhu K, Wildermuth A, Vig S (2004) Natural resource damage assessments: methods and cases. Waste Management and Research Center, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Champaign IL. RR-108.https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/1979/RR-108.pdf?se.... Accessed 29 Apr 2019
- Brusati ED, DuBowy PJ, Lacher TE. Comparing ecological functions of natural and created wetlands for shorebirds in Texas. Waterbirds. 2001;24(3):371–380. doi: 10.2307/1522067. - DOI
- Champ PA, Boyle K, Brown TC. A primer on nonmarket valuation. Netherlands: Springer; 2017.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical