Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Silverchair Information Systems full text link Silverchair Information Systems Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Meta-Analysis
.2019 Nov 29;15(11):20190649.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0649. Epub 2019 Nov 20.

The effects of anthropogenic noise on animals: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The effects of anthropogenic noise on animals: a meta-analysis

Hansjoerg P Kunc et al. Biol Lett..

Abstract

Anthropogenic noise has become a major global pollutant and studies have shown that noise can affect animals. However, such single studies cannot provide holistic quantitative assessments on the potential effects of noise across species. Using a multi-level phylogenetically controlled meta-analysis, we provide the first holistic quantitative analysis on the effects of anthropogenic noise. We found that noise affects many species of amphibians, arthropods, birds, fish mammals, molluscs and reptilians. Interestingly, phylogeny contributes only little to the variation in response to noise. Thus, the effects of anthropogenic noise can be explained by the majority of species responding to noise rather than a few species being particularly sensitive to noise. Consequently, anthropogenic noise must be considered as a serious form of environmental change and pollution as it affects both aquatic and terrestrial species. Our analyses provide the quantitative evidence necessary for legislative bodies to regulate this environmental stressor more effectively.

Keywords: global change; meta-analysis; noise pollution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Effects of anthropogenic noise on taxonomic groups. Shown are the standardized mean differences (SMDH) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from random-effects models. The dashed line at zero indicates no effect of anthropogenic noise; an effect of noise occurs if the 95% CI of the SMDH does not overlap zero (for forest plots of each species see electronic supplementary material, figure S2; for sample sizes of effect sizes, studies and species table 1b). (Online version in colour.)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Heterogeneities (I2) calculated from phylogenetically controlled meta-analyses for the overall model (top bar) and six separate models for the taxonomic groups. Black bars denoteIefffectsize2, reflecting inconsistencies within study variation. Grey bars denoteIstudy2, reflecting inconsistencies among studies. White bars reflect in the top barIphylogeny2 and in the bars belowIspecies2.Iphylogeny2 are inconsistencies due to phylogenetic relatedness andIspecies2 are inconsistencies due to differences among species. All graphs combined within each analysis isItotal2.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Stenseth NC, Mysterud A, Ottersen G, Hurrell JW, Chan KS, Lima M. 2002. Ecological effects of climate fluctuations. Science 297, 1292–1296. ( 10.1126/science.1071281) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walther G, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJ, Fromentin J, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein F. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416, 389 ( 10.1038/416389a) - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. 2011. Burden of disease from environmental noise: quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe. Seehttp://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/136466/e94888.pdf.
    1. Shannon G, et al. 2016. A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife. Biol. Rev. 91, 982–1005. ( 10.1111/brv.12207) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morley EL, Jones G, Radford AN. 2014. The importance of invertebrates when considering the impacts of anthropogenic noise. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20132683 ( 10.1098/rspb.2013.2683) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Silverchair Information Systems full text link Silverchair Information Systems Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp