Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

BioMed Central full text link BioMed Central Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

Review
.2019 Aug 9;19(1):1077.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7391-z.

Public health effects of gambling - debate on a conceptual model

Affiliations
Review

Public health effects of gambling - debate on a conceptual model

Tiina Latvala et al. BMC Public Health..

Abstract

Background: Gambling for money is a popular leisure time activity in most countries, which has major social and economic impacts not only affecting the gambler, but his/her significant others, and the society. Gambling impact studies can help researchers and policymakers compare the health and social costs and benefits of different gambling policies and can be used when considering which gambling policies will reduce or increase costs or benefits the most. In a public health approach, the impacts of gambling, negative and positive, are assessed across the entire severity spectrum of the activity. Although some studies have created basic principles for conducting impact studies, a theoretical model is currently lacking. The aim of this debate is to review complementing and contrasting views on the effects of gambling to create a conceptual model, where a public health perspective is applied.

Main text: The effects of gambling can be structuralized using a conceptual model, where impacts are divided into negative and positive; costs and benefits. Costs and benefits are categorized into three classes: financial, labor and health, and well-being. These classes manifest in personal, interpersonal, and societal levels. Individual impacts cause effects on a personal level to gamblers themselves. External impacts influence the interpersonal and society/community levels and concern other people. The temporal level refers to the development, severity and scope of the gambling impact. These include general impacts, impacts of problem gambling and long-term impacts of gambling.

Conclusions: The conceptual model offers a base on which to start building common methodology for assessing the impact of gambling on the society. While measuring monetary impacts is not always straightforward, the main issue is how to measure the social impacts, which are typically ignored in calculations, as are personal and interpersonal impacts. The reviewed empirical work largely concentrated on the costs of gambling, especially costs on the community level. The Model can be used to identify areas where research is scarce. Filling the gaps in knowledge is essential in forming a balanced evidence base on the impacts of gambling. Ideally, this evidence could be the starting point in formulating public policies on gambling.

Keywords: Conceptual model; Gambling; Public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The structure of the Public Health Impacts of Gambling (PHIGam) model
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The positive impacts of gambling on personal, interpersonal and community levels
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The negative impacts of gambling on personal, interpersonal and community levels
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Derevensky JL. Teen gambling: understanding a growing epidemic. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing; 2012.
    1. Productivity Commission 2010, Gambling, Report no. 50, Canberra. Available from: Available from:https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/gambling-2010/report.
    1. Griffiths MD. Problem gambling in Europe: what do we know? Casino Gaming Int. 2010;6(2):81–84.
    1. Martin F, Lichtenberg PA, Templin TN. A longitudinal study: casino gambling attitudes, motivations, and gambling patterns among urban elders. J Gambl Stud. 2011;27(2):287–297. doi: 10.1007/s10899-010-9202-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McNeilly DP, Burke WJ. Late life gambling: the attitudes and behaviors of older adults. J Gambl Stud. 2000;16(4):393–415. doi: 10.1023/A:1009432223369. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
BioMed Central full text link BioMed Central Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp