Time spent looking at food during a delay of gratification task is positively associated with children's consumption at ad libitum laboratory meals
- PMID:31276712
- DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104341
Time spent looking at food during a delay of gratification task is positively associated with children's consumption at ad libitum laboratory meals
Abstract
Greater ability to delay gratification for an immediate food reward may protect against the development of obesity. However, it is not known if the behaviors children exhibit during a delay of gratification task are related to overeating in other contexts. The purpose of this analysis was to assess the relationship between observed child coping strategies during a delay of gratification task and laboratory intake from ad libitum test-meals. The sample consisted of 40, 7-9 year old children (40% (N = 16 with overweight/obesity). Across 5 laboratory visits, children consumed 3 identical test-meals presented after varying exposure conditions (i.e., no exposure, exposure to food commercials, exposure to toy commercials). On the first visit, children were recorded during a delay of gratification task which was coded for three behavioral themes: looking at vs. away from food, talking vs. staying silent, and fidgeting vs. sitting still. Pearson correlations and multiple regressions were run to look at the relationships between coping strategies and test-meal intake. Time spent looking away from food was negatively associated with ad libitum food consumption at the meals. Conversely, greater time spent looking at food was positively associated with ad libitum food consumption. These relationships were independent of covariates likely to influence intake (e.g., sex, age, weight status, parent income) and were more robust following food rather than toy commercial exposure. Children who spent more time looking at food and less time looking away during a delay of gratification task may be vulnerable to overeating in other contexts. Upon replication in larger samples, these behaviors could serve as modifiable targets in the development of childhood obesity prevention programs.
Keywords: Children; Delay of gratification; Laboratory test-meal; Observational coding.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
- Is brain response to food rewards related to overeating? A test of the reward surfeit model of overeating in children.Adise S, Geier CF, Roberts NJ, White CN, Keller KL.Adise S, et al.Appetite. 2018 Sep 1;128:167-179. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.014. Epub 2018 Jun 8.Appetite. 2018.PMID:29890186Free PMC article.
- Associations Between Cool and Hot Executive Functions and Children's Eating Behavior.Tan CC, Lumeng JC.Tan CC, et al.Curr Nutr Rep. 2018 Jun;7(2):21-28. doi: 10.1007/s13668-018-0224-3.Curr Nutr Rep. 2018.PMID:29892787Review.
- Emotion regulation strategies and childhood obesity in high risk preschoolers.Power TG, Olivera YA, Hill RA, Beck AD, Hopwood V, Garcia KS, Ramos GG, Fisher JO, O'Connor TM, Hughes SO.Power TG, et al.Appetite. 2016 Dec 1;107:623-627. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Sep 13.Appetite. 2016.PMID:27620645Free PMC article.
- The Relationship between Structure-Related Food Parenting Practices and Children's Heightened Levels of Self-Regulation in Eating.Frankel LA, Powell E, Jansen E.Frankel LA, et al.Child Obes. 2018 Feb/Mar;14(2):81-88. doi: 10.1089/chi.2017.0164. Epub 2017 Dec 1.Child Obes. 2018.PMID:29193981
- Family environmental factors influencing the developing behavioral controls of food intake and childhood overweight.Birch LL, Davison KK.Birch LL, et al.Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001 Aug;48(4):893-907. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70347-3.Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001.PMID:11494642Review.
Cited by
- "Food" and "non-food" self-regulation in childhood: a review and reciprocal analysis.Russell CG, Russell A.Russell CG, et al.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Mar 10;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00928-5.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020.PMID:32151265Free PMC article.Review.
- Effects of aerobic exercise on executive function among overweight and obese children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Wang Y, Wang H, Zhao H.Wang Y, et al.Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 28;15:1485610. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1485610. eCollection 2024.Front Psychol. 2024.PMID:39529725Free PMC article.
- Children's eating behaviours and related constructs: conceptual and theoretical foundations and their implications.Russell A, Jansen E, Burnett AJ, Lee J, Russell CG.Russell A, et al.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Feb 15;20(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01407-3.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023.PMID:36793039Free PMC article.Review.
- Child meal microstructure and eating behaviors: A systematic review.Pearce AL, Cevallos MC, Romano O, Daoud E, Keller KL.Pearce AL, et al.Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105752. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105752. Epub 2021 Oct 16.Appetite. 2022.PMID:34662600Free PMC article.Review.
- Do Hot Executive Functions Relate to BMI and Body Composition in School Age Children?Szcześniewska P, Hanć T, Bryl E, Dutkiewicz A, Borkowska AR, Paszyńska E, Słopień A, Dmitrzak-Węglarz M.Szcześniewska P, et al.Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 12;11(6):780. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060780.Brain Sci. 2021.PMID:34204610Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical