Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in northern China in the Late Neolithic
- PMID:31019300
- DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1153-z
Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in northern China in the Late Neolithic
Abstract
The study of language origin and divergence is important for understanding the history of human populations and their cultures. The Sino-Tibetan language family is the second largest in the world after Indo-European, and there is a long-running debate about its phylogeny and the time depth of its original divergence1. Here we perform a Bayesian phylogenetic analysis to examine two competing hypotheses of the origin of the Sino-Tibetan language family: the 'northern-origin hypothesis' and the 'southwestern-origin hypothesis'. The northern-origin hypothesis states that the initial expansion of Sino-Tibetan languages occurred approximately 4,000-6,000 years before present (BP; taken as AD 1950) in the Yellow River basin of northern China2-4, and that this expansion is associated with the development of the Yangshao and/or Majiayao Neolithic cultures. The southwestern-origin hypothesis states that an early expansion of Sino-Tibetan languages occurred before 9,000 years BP from a region in southwest Sichuan province in China5 or in northeast India6, where a high diversity of Tibeto-Burman languages exists today. Consistent with the northern-origin hypothesis, our Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of 109 languages with 949 lexical root-meanings produced an estimated time depth for the divergence of Sino-Tibetan languages of approximately 4,200-7,800 years BP, with an average value of approximately 5,900 years BP. In addition, the phylogeny supported a dichotomy between Sinitic and Tibeto-Burman languages. Our results are compatible with the archaeological records, and with the farming and language dispersal hypothesis7 of agricultural expansion in China. Our findings provide a linguistic foothold for further interdisciplinary studies of prehistoric human activity in East Asia.
Comment in
- The origin and spread of the Sino-Tibetan language family.LaPolla RJ.LaPolla RJ.Nature. 2019 May;569(7754):45-47. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01214-6.Nature. 2019.PMID:31036967No abstract available.
References
- Handel, Z. What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a field and a language family in flux. Lang. Linguist. Compass 2, 422–441 (2008). - DOI
- LaPolla, R. J. in Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics (eds Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, A. Y.) 225–254 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2001).
- Matisoff, J. A. Sino-Tibetan linguistics: present state and future prospects. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 20, 469–504 (1991). - DOI
- LaPolla, R. J. & Thurgood, G. Sino-Tibetan Languages (Routledge, London, 2016). - DOI
- van Driem, G. in The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics (eds Sagart, L. et al.) 81–106 (Routledge, London, 2005).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials