Does regular cannabis use affect neuroanatomy? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of structural neuroimaging studies
- PMID:30706169
- DOI: 10.1007/s00406-019-00979-1
Does regular cannabis use affect neuroanatomy? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of structural neuroimaging studies
Abstract
Regular cannabis use is associated with adverse cognitive and mental health outcomes that have been ascribed to aberrant neuroanatomy in brain regions densely innervated with cannabinoid receptors. Neuroanatomical differences between cannabis users and controls have been assessed in multiple structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) studies. However, there is heterogeneity in the results leading to cautious interpretation of the data so far. We examined the sMRI evidence to date in human cannabis users, to establish more definitely whether neuroanatomical alterations are associated with regular cannabis use. The regional specificity and association with cannabis use indices (i.e. cumulative dosage, duration) were also explored. We systematically reviewed and meta-analysed published sMRI studies investigating regional brain volumes (cortical, subcortical and global) in cannabis users and non-user controls. Three electronic databases were searched (PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO). A total of 17 meta-analyses were conducted (one for each cortical, subcortical and global volume) using the generic inverse variance method, whereby standardised mean difference in volume was calculated between users and non-users. Exploratory meta-regressions were conducted to investigate the association between cannabis use indices and regional brain volumes. A total of 30 articles were eligible for inclusion, contributing 106 effect sizes across 17 meta-analyses. Regular cannabis users had significantly smaller volumes of the hippocampus (SMD = 0.14, 95% CIs [0.02, 0.27]; Z = 2.29, p = 0.02, I2 = 74%) and orbitofrontal cortex {medial (SMD = 0.30, 95% CIs [0.15, 0.45]; Z = 3.89, p = 0.0001, I2 = 51%), lateral (SMD = 0.19, 95% CIs [0.07, 0.32]; Z = 3.10, p = 0.002, I2 = 26%)} relative to controls. The volumes of the hippocampus and orbitofrontal cortex were not significantly associated with cannabis duration and dosage. Our findings are consistent with evidence of aberrance in brain regions involved in reward, learning and memory, and motivation circuits in the regular use of substances other than cannabis, pointing to commonality in neurobiological abnormalities between regular users of cannabis and of other substances.
Similar articles
- Brain Anatomical Alterations in Young Cannabis Users: Is it All Hype? A Meta-Analysis of Structural Neuroimaging Studies.Lorenzetti V, Kowalczyk M, Duehlmeyer L, Greenwood LM, Chye Y, Yücel M, Whittle S, Roberts CA.Lorenzetti V, et al.Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2023 Feb;8(1):184-196. doi: 10.1089/can.2021.0099. Epub 2022 Apr 19.Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2023.PMID:35443799
- The Role of Cannabinoids in Neuroanatomic Alterations in Cannabis Users.Lorenzetti V, Solowij N, Yücel M.Lorenzetti V, et al.Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Apr 1;79(7):e17-31. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Dec 4.Biol Psychiatry. 2016.PMID:26858212Review.
- Patterns of brain function associated with cannabis cue-reactivity in regular cannabis users: a systematic review of fMRI studies.Sehl H, Terrett G, Greenwood LM, Kowalczyk M, Thomson H, Poudel G, Manning V, Lorenzetti V.Sehl H, et al.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021 Oct;238(10):2709-2728. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-05973-x. Epub 2021 Sep 10.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021.PMID:34505940Free PMC article.Review.
- Longitudinal study of hippocampal volumes in heavy cannabis users.Koenders L, Lorenzetti V, de Haan L, Suo C, Vingerhoets W, van den Brink W, Wiers RW, Meijer CJ, Machielsen M, Goudriaan AE, Veltman DJ, Yücel M, Cousijn J.Koenders L, et al.J Psychopharmacol. 2017 Aug;31(8):1027-1034. doi: 10.1177/0269881117718380. Epub 2017 Jul 25.J Psychopharmacol. 2017.PMID:28741422Free PMC article.
- Is cannabis neurotoxic for the healthy brain? A meta-analytical review of structural brain alterations in non-psychotic users.Rocchetti M, Crescini A, Borgwardt S, Caverzasi E, Politi P, Atakan Z, Fusar-Poli P.Rocchetti M, et al.Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2013 Nov;67(7):483-92. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12085. Epub 2013 Sep 30.Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2013.PMID:24118193Review.
Cited by
- Nicotine use during late adolescence and young adulthood is associated with changes in hippocampal volume and memory performance.Happer JP, Courtney KE, Baca RE, Andrade G, Thompson C, Shen Q, Liu TT, Jacobus J.Happer JP, et al.Front Neurosci. 2024 Aug 16;18:1436951. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1436951. eCollection 2024.Front Neurosci. 2024.PMID:39221006Free PMC article.
- Assessing the Role of Cannabis Use on Cortical Surface Structure in Adolescents and Young Adults: Exploring Gender and Aerobic Fitness as Potential Moderators.Sullivan RM, Wallace AL, Wade NE, Swartz AM, Lisdahl KM.Sullivan RM, et al.Brain Sci. 2020 Feb 22;10(2):117. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10020117.Brain Sci. 2020.PMID:32098300Free PMC article.
- Abnormal developmental of structural covariance networks in young adults with heavy cannabis use: a 3-year follow-up study.Xu H, Li J, Huang H, Yin B, Li DD.Xu H, et al.Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 20;14(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-02764-8.Transl Psychiatry. 2024.PMID:38245512Free PMC article.
- Cognitive Profiles of Adolescent Inpatients with Substance Use Disorder.Becker ABC, Lüken LM, Kelker L, Holtmann M, Daseking M, Legenbauer T.Becker ABC, et al.Children (Basel). 2022 May 21;9(5):756. doi: 10.3390/children9050756.Children (Basel). 2022.PMID:35626933Free PMC article.
- Prefrontal cortex and putamen grey matter alterations in cannabis and tobacco users.Daniju Y, Faulkner P, Brandt K, Allen P.Daniju Y, et al.J Psychopharmacol. 2022 Dec;36(12):1315-1323. doi: 10.1177/02698811221117523. Epub 2022 Sep 16.J Psychopharmacol. 2022.PMID:36112825Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources