Association of Clinician Knowledge and Statin Beliefs With Statin Therapy Use and Lipid Levels (A Survey of US Practice in the PALM Registry)
- PMID:30660354
- PMCID: PMC6526057
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.12.031
Association of Clinician Knowledge and Statin Beliefs With Statin Therapy Use and Lipid Levels (A Survey of US Practice in the PALM Registry)
Abstract
Guideline implementation requires clinician knowledge but may be influenced by pre-existing beliefs and biases. We assessed the association of these clinician factors with lipid management following the release of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidelines. In the PALM registry, 774 clinicians completed a survey to assess their knowledge of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, belief in statin benefit, and statin safety concerns. The association of these factors with statin use, statin dosing, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were assessed in the 6,839 patients treated by these clinicians between May and November 2015. Overall, 63.9% of clinicians responded to at least 3 out of 4 hypothetical scenarios in concordance with guideline recommendations (good tested knowledge), 88.4% reported belief in statin benefit, and 15.4% raised concerns about statin safety. Belief in statin benefit was more prevalent among cardiologists, who represented 48.8% of the clinicians surveyed, and concerns regarding statin safety were higher among noncardiologists and clinicians in an academic setting. Guideline knowledge was not associated with a difference in statin use (74.1% vs 73.8%, p = 0.84) and achievement of LDL-C level <100 mg/dl (54.7% vs 52.4%, p = 0.07). However, patients treated by clinicians who reported belief in statin benefit were more likely to receive guideline-recommended statin intensity (41.9% vs 36.9%, p = 0.03), whereas patients treated by clinicians expressing statin safety concerns were less likely receive statins of at least guideline-recommended intensity (36.8% vs 42.5%, p = 0.001) and to achieve an LDL-C <100 mg/dl (44.1% vs 56.1%, p <0.001); the latter persisted after multivariable adjustment (odds ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.63 to 0.89). In conclusion, clinician beliefs regarding benefits and risks of statins were significantly associated with guideline adherence and patients' achieved LDL-C levels, whereas clinician knowledge of guideline recommendations was not.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures


Similar articles
- Does clinician-reported lipid guideline adoption translate to guideline-adherent care? An evaluation of the Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management (PALM) registry.Lowenstern A, Li S, Navar AM, Virani S, Lee LV, Louie MJ, Peterson ED, Wang TY.Lowenstern A, et al.Am Heart J. 2018 Jun;200:118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Mar 24.Am Heart J. 2018.PMID:29898839Free PMC article.
- Association of Patient Perceptions of Cardiovascular Risk and Beliefs on Statin Drugs With Racial Differences in Statin Use: Insights From the Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management Registry.Nanna MG, Navar AM, Zakroysky P, Xiang Q, Goldberg AC, Robinson J, Roger VL, Virani SS, Wilson PWF, Elassal J, Lee LV, Wang TY, Peterson ED.Nanna MG, et al.JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Aug 1;3(8):739-748. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1511.JAMA Cardiol. 2018.PMID:29898219Free PMC article.
- Practice-level variation in statin use and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol control in the United States: Results from the Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management (PALM) registry.Nanna MG, Navar AM, Wang TY, Li S, Virani SS, Li Z, Robinson JG, Roger VL, Wilson PWF, Goldberg AC, Koren A, Louie MJ, Peterson ED.Nanna MG, et al.Am Heart J. 2019 Aug;214:113-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 May 22.Am Heart J. 2019.PMID:31202098Free PMC article.
- What the guidelines do not say: statin non-benefit groups.Morris PB, McLain K.Morris PB, et al.Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2015 Jan;17(1):468. doi: 10.1007/s11883-014-0468-3.Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2015.PMID:25404095Review.
- Targeting low HDL-cholesterol to decrease residual cardiovascular risk in the managed care setting.Cziraky MJ, Watson KE, Talbert RL.Cziraky MJ, et al.J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Oct;14(8 Suppl):S3-28; quiz S30-1.J Manag Care Pharm. 2008.PMID:19891279Review.
Cited by
- High-Intensity Statin Use Among Patients With Atherosclerosis in the U.S.Nelson AJ, Haynes K, Shambhu S, Eapen Z, Cziraky MJ, Nanna MG, Calvert SB, Gallagher K, Pagidipati NJ, Granger CB.Nelson AJ, et al.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 10;79(18):1802-1813. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.048.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022.PMID:35512860Free PMC article.
- Clinical potential of inclisiran for patients with a high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.Nishikido T.Nishikido T.Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Jan 30;22(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01752-4.Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023.PMID:36717882Free PMC article.Review.
- Geographic variations in lipid-lowering therapy utilization, LDL-C levels, and proportion retrospectively meeting the ACC/AHA very high-risk criteria in a real-world population of patients with major atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events in the United States.Baum SJ, Rane PB, Nunna S, Habib M, Philip K, Sun K, Wang X, Wade RL.Baum SJ, et al.Am J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Mar 30;6:100177. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2021.100177. eCollection 2021 Jun.Am J Prev Cardiol. 2021.PMID:34327500Free PMC article.
- Physician preferences for treatment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD)-A discrete choice experiment.Graf M, Khera AV, May SG, Chung S, N'dri L, Cristino J, Electricwala B.Graf M, et al.Heliyon. 2024 Aug 8;10(16):e35990. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35990. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.Heliyon. 2024.PMID:39247312Free PMC article.
- Beliefs, risk perceptions, and lipid management among patients with and without diabetes: Results from the PALM registry.Lowenstern A, Li S, Virani SS, Navar AM, Li Z, Robinson JG, Roger VL, Goldberg AC, Koren A, Louie MJ, Peterson ED, Wang TY.Lowenstern A, et al.Am Heart J. 2020 Jul;225:88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.04.018. Epub 2020 Apr 30.Am Heart J. 2020.PMID:32485329Free PMC article.
References
- Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Rader DJ, Rouleau JL, Belder R, Joyal SV, Hill KA, Pfeffer MA, Skene AM. Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1495–1504. - PubMed
- Downs JR, Clearfield M, Weis S, Whitney E, Shapiro DR, Beere PA, Langendorfer A, Stein EA, Kruyer W, Gotto AM Jr. Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study. JAMA 1998;279:1615–1622. - PubMed
- LaRosa JC, Grundy SM, Waters DD, Shear C, Barter P, Fruchart JC, Gotto AM, Greten H, Kastelein JJ, Shepherd J, Wenger NK. Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1425–1435. - PubMed
- Nicholls SJ, Ballantyne CM, Barter PJ, Chapman MJ, Erbel RM, Libby P, Raichlen JS, Uno K, Borgman M, Wolski K, Nissen SE. Effect of two intensive statin regimens on progression of coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2011;365:2078–2087. - PubMed
- Pedersen TR, Faergeman O, Kastelein JJ, Olsson AG, Tikkanen MJ, Holme I, Larsen ML, Bendiksen FS, Lindahl C, Szarek M, Tsai J. High-dose atorvastatin vs usual-dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: the IDEAL study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005;294:2437–2445. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical