Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Wolters Kluwer full text link Wolters Kluwer Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2019 Aug;30(5):422-428.
doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000453.

Further pharmacological comparison of D-methamphetamine and L-methamphetamine in rats: abuse-related behavioral and physiological indices

Affiliations

Further pharmacological comparison of D-methamphetamine and L-methamphetamine in rats: abuse-related behavioral and physiological indices

Zhaoxia Xue et al. Behav Pharmacol.2019 Aug.

Abstract

Previous preclinical research suggests that L-methamphetamine (L -MA) has potential therapeutic utility to treat psychostimulant abuse. This study examined potential abuse-related and adverse physiological effects of D -MA and L -MA alone and in combination in rats, as these effects had not been previously characterized. Potential abuse-related effects were examined in locomotor sensitization and conditioned place preference paradigms. Body temperature was monitored to assess the physiological effects of these drugs or drug combinations. In the locomotor study, D-MA induced locomotor sensitization to both D-MA and L -MA. L -MA induced locomotor sensitization only to D-MA. Responses to a combination of L-MA and D -MA were not differentially affected by L-MA or D-MA conditioning. In the conditioned place preference study, D-MA and L -MA each induced significant place preference. L -MA did not attenuate D-MA-induced place preference. In the body temperature study, D-MA induced hyperthermia and L -MA induced hypothermia. In combination, L -MA did not affect D-MA-induced hyperthermia. These data suggest that L -MA alone produces less abuse-related and adverse physiological effects than D-MA, but modulates and is modulated by concurrent and subsequent D-MA exposure, which may enhance the abuse liability of both drugs. These findings should be considered when L -MA is proposed for replacement therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Effects ofd-MA orl-MA treatment on induction of sensitization to the treatment drug (left-top and right-top panels), cross-sensitization to the opposite drug (left-middle andright-middle panels), or a combination ofd- andl-MA (bottom panel). Closed symbols represent rats treated withl-MA for days 1–8, open symbols represent rats treated withd-MA for days 1–8. The ‘day 1’ data in the left-top and right-top panels are replotted in the left-middle and right-middle panels, respectively, for between-group comparison in the cross-sensitization experiment. Vertical axes are locomotion (in cm) per 20 min bin. Horizontal axes are the dose ofd-MA (left-top and left-middle panels),l-MA (right-top andright-middle panels), or combination dose ofd- andl-MA (bottom panel) in mg/kg. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 results of Bonferroni’s post-tests.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effects ofd-MA,l-MA, ord-MA in combination with 10 mg/kgl-MA on conditioned place preference. Vertical axes are preference scores. Horizontal axes are the doses ofd-MA (top row) andl-MA (bottom row). *P < 0.05 result of Bonferroni’s post-test, **P < 0.01 two-way ANOVA main effect ofl-MA treatment.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Effects ofd-MA (left panel),l-MA (center panel), orl-MA in combination withd-MA (right panel) on body temperature. Vertical axes are change in body temperature from baseline (in °C). Horizontal axes are time in min. Symbols shaded in gray represent significantly different (p < 0.05) as compared to vehicle treatment according to Bonferroni’s post-test (left panels).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. (2011) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC
    1. Courtney KE, Ray LA (2014) Methamphetamine: An update on epidemiology, pharmacology, clinical phenomenology, and treatment literature. Drug and alcohol dependence 143: 11–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cunningham CL, Gremel CM, Groblewski PA (2006) Drug-induced conditioned place preference and aversion in mice. Nature protocols 1: 1662–70. - PubMed
    1. DEA (2016) National Drug Threat Assessment.
    1. Desai RI, Bergman J (2010) Drug discrimination in methamphetamine-trained rats: effects of cholinergic nicotinic compounds. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics 335: 807–16. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Wolters Kluwer full text link Wolters Kluwer Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp