Comparable patterns of muscle facilitation evoked by individual corticomotoneuronal (CM) cells and by single intracortical microstimuli in primates: evidence for functional groups of CM cells
- PMID:2984354
- DOI: 10.1152/jn.1985.53.3.786
Comparable patterns of muscle facilitation evoked by individual corticomotoneuronal (CM) cells and by single intracortical microstimuli in primates: evidence for functional groups of CM cells
Abstract
We compared the averaged responses of forelimb muscles to action potentials of single motor cortex cells and to single intracortical microstimuli (S-ICMS). Activity of precentral neurons and 12 identified forelimb muscles (6 flexors and 6 extensors of wrist and fingers) was recorded in macaques while they performed alternating ramp-and-hold wrist movements. Action potentials of cells that covaried reliably with wrist flexion or extension were used to compile spike-triggered averages (spike-TAs) of rectified electromyographic (EMG) activity of six synergistically coactivated muscles. Cells whose spikes were followed by a clear postspike facilitation (PSF) of rectified muscle activity were designated corticomotoneuronal (CM) cells. CM cells typically facilitated a subset of the coactivated muscles called the cell's target muscles. The relative strength of the PSF in different target muscles ranged from clear increases above base-line fluctuations to weak but significant effects. For each CM cell we characterized the "PSF profile" of facilitation across different muscles, defined as the relative strength of PSF in each of the coactivated agonist muscles. After identifying the CM cell's target muscles, we delivered S-ICMS through the microelectrode at the same site. Biphasic stimuli were delivered during the same wrist movements in which the recorded CM cell had been active. Stimulus intensities were too weak (typically 5-10 microA) and their repetition rate too slow (5-15 Hz) to evoke muscle excitation evident in the raw EMG record. However, stimulus-triggered averages (stimulus-TAs) of the rectified EMGs of coactivated muscles revealed consistent patterns of poststimulus facilitation (PStimF). In most cases the muscles facilitated by the CM cell in spike-TAs (n = 60) were also facilitated by S-ICMS in stimulus-TAs. At sites of CM cells the threshold stimulus intensities for evoking a statistically significant effect were between 0.5 and 2 microA. S-ICMS of 5 microA evoked PStimF that was, on the average, six times stronger than the PSF of the CM cell. The height of the facilitation peak relative to base-line fluctuations was 5-60 times greater for the stimuli than the spikes of the CM cell. The average onset latency of PStimF (8.0 +/- 1.2 ms) was 1.3 ms longer than the mean latency of PSF (6.7 +/- 1.4 ms). At two-thirds of the cortical sites where both spike- and stimulus-TAs were computed (n = 30), the PStimF profile exactly matched the PSF profile.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Similar articles
- Patterns of facilitation and suppression of antagonist forelimb muscles from motor cortex sites in the awake monkey.Cheney PD, Fetz EE, Palmer SS.Cheney PD, et al.J Neurophysiol. 1985 Mar;53(3):805-20. doi: 10.1152/jn.1985.53.3.805.J Neurophysiol. 1985.PMID:2984355
- Effects of single intracortical microstimuli in motor cortex on activity of identified forearm motor units in behaving monkeys.Palmer SS, Fetz EE.Palmer SS, et al.J Neurophysiol. 1985 Nov;54(5):1194-212. doi: 10.1152/jn.1985.54.5.1194.J Neurophysiol. 1985.PMID:3001235
- Characteristics of corticomotoneuronal postspike facilitation and reciprocal suppression of EMG activity in the monkey.Kasser RJ, Cheney PD.Kasser RJ, et al.J Neurophysiol. 1985 Apr;53(4):959-78. doi: 10.1152/jn.1985.53.4.959.J Neurophysiol. 1985.PMID:3998800
- Control of forelimb muscle activity by populations of corticomotoneuronal and rubromotoneuronal cells.Fetz EE, Cheney PD, Mewes K, Palmer S.Fetz EE, et al.Prog Brain Res. 1989;80:437-49; discussion 427-30. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62241-4.Prog Brain Res. 1989.PMID:2517459Review.
- Functional relations between primate motor cortex cells and muscles: fixed and flexible.Fetz EE, Cheney PD.Fetz EE, et al.Ciba Found Symp. 1987;132:98-117. doi: 10.1002/9780470513545.ch7.Ciba Found Symp. 1987.PMID:3123173Review.
Cited by
- Neuromorphic-Based Neuroprostheses for Brain Rewiring: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives in Neuroengineering.Chiappalone M, Cota VR, Carè M, Di Florio M, Beaubois R, Buccelli S, Barban F, Brofiga M, Averna A, Bonacini F, Guggenmos DJ, Bornat Y, Massobrio P, Bonifazi P, Levi T.Chiappalone M, et al.Brain Sci. 2022 Nov 19;12(11):1578. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12111578.Brain Sci. 2022.PMID:36421904Free PMC article.Review.
- Complex organization of human primary motor cortex: a high-resolution fMRI study.Meier JD, Aflalo TN, Kastner S, Graziano MS.Meier JD, et al.J Neurophysiol. 2008 Oct;100(4):1800-12. doi: 10.1152/jn.90531.2008. Epub 2008 Aug 6.J Neurophysiol. 2008.PMID:18684903Free PMC article.
- Motor cortex - to act or not to act?Ebbesen CL, Brecht M.Ebbesen CL, et al.Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Oct 18;18(11):694-705. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.119.Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017.PMID:29042690Review.
- Selection of cortical dynamics for motor behaviour by the basal ganglia.Mannella F, Baldassarre G.Mannella F, et al.Biol Cybern. 2015 Dec;109(6):575-95. doi: 10.1007/s00422-015-0662-6. Epub 2015 Nov 4.Biol Cybern. 2015.PMID:26537483Free PMC article.
- Primary motor cortex neurons classified in a postural task predict muscle activation patterns in a reaching task.Heming EA, Lillicrap TP, Omrani M, Herter TM, Pruszynski JA, Scott SH.Heming EA, et al.J Neurophysiol. 2016 Apr;115(4):2021-32. doi: 10.1152/jn.00971.2015. Epub 2016 Feb 3.J Neurophysiol. 2016.PMID:26843605Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources