Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

BioMed Central full text link BioMed Central Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Meta-Analysis
.2017 Nov 22;18(1):482.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1836-2.

The effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing physical activity in adults with persistent musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing physical activity in adults with persistent musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Joanne Marley et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord..

Abstract

Background: Individuals with persistent musculoskeletal pain (PMP) have an increased risk of developing co-morbid health conditions and for early-mortality compared to those without pain. Despite irrefutable evidence supporting the role of physical activity in reducing these risks; there has been limited synthesis of the evidence, potentially impacting the optimisation of these forms of interventions. This review examines the effectiveness of interventions in improving levels of physical activity and the components of these interventions.

Methods: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials were included in this review. The following databases were searched from inception to March 2016: CENTRAL in the Cochrane Library, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and AMED. Two reviewers independently screened citations, assessed eligibility, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and coded intervention content using the behaviour change taxonomy (BCTTv1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques. GRADE was used to rate the quality of the evidence.

Results: The full text of 276 articles were assessed for eligibility, twenty studies involving 3441 participants were included in the review. Across the studies the mean number of BCTs coded was eight (range 0-16); with 'goal setting' and 'instruction on how to perform the behaviour' most frequently coded. For measures of subjective physical activity: interventions were ineffective in the short term, based on very low quality evidence; had a small effect in the medium term based on low quality evidence (SMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.48) and had a small effect in the longer term (SMD 0.21 95% CI 0.08 to 0.33) based on moderate quality evidence. For measures of objective physical activity: interventions were ineffective - based on very low to low quality evidence.

Conclusions: There is some evidence supporting the effectiveness of interventions in improving subjectively measured physical activity however, the evidence is mostly based on low quality studies and the effects are small. Given the quality of the evidence, further research is likely/very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in effect estimates and is likely to change the estimates. Future studies should provide details on intervention components and incorporate objective measures of physical activity.

Keywords: Behaviour change techniques; Chronic pain; Low back pain; Musculoskeletal pain; Osteoarthritis; Persistent pain; Physical activity; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests, two authors of this review are authors of studies included in the review (SMcD and MAT).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study Flow Diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of bias summary of all studies assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tool
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Risk of bias in individual studies
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Effects of intervention versus control on subjectively measured physical activity: short-term, medium-term and long-term
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Effects of intervention versus control on objectively measured physical activity: short-term, medium term and long-term
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Forest plot: Studies grouped by effect size (aggregated subjective and objective measures) post intervention
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(4):287–333. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. EFIC . Pain proposal improving the current and future management of chronic pain. 2010.
    1. IHME . The global burden of disease: generating evidence, guiding policy. European Union and European free trade association regional edition. Seattle: IHME, 2013: Institute For Health Metrics And Evaluation University of Washington; 2013.
    1. IHME. The Global Burden Of Disease: Generating Evidence, Guiding Policy. European Union And European Free Trade Association Regional Edition. Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013: Institute For Health Metrics And Evaluation University of Washington.
    1. Andersson HI. Increased mortality among individuals with chronic widespread pain relates to lifestyle factors: a prospective population-based study. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(24):1980–1987. doi: 10.3109/09638280902874154. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
BioMed Central full text link BioMed Central Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp