Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

HighWire full text link HighWire Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

Review
.2017 May 11;7(5):e016114.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016114.

Knee arthroscopy versus conservative management in patients with degenerative knee disease: a systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Knee arthroscopy versus conservative management in patients with degenerative knee disease: a systematic review

Romina Brignardello-Petersen et al. BMJ Open..

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effects and complications of arthroscopic surgery compared with conservative management strategies in patients with degenerative knee disease.

Design: Systematic review.

Main outcome measures: Pain, function, adverse events.

Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar and Open Grey up to August 2016.

Eligibility criteria: For effects, randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing arthroscopic surgery with a conservative management strategy (including sham surgery) in patients with degenerative knee disease. For complications, RCTs and observational studies.

Review methods: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias for patient-important outcomes. A parallel guideline committee (BMJ Rapid Recommendations) provided input on the design and interpretation of the systematic review, including selection of patient-important outcomes. We used the GRADE approach to rate the certainty (quality) of the evidence.

Results: We included 13 RCTs and 12 observational studies. With respect to pain, the review identified high-certainty evidence that knee arthroscopy results in a very small reduction in pain up to 3 months (mean difference =5.4 on a 100-point scale, 95% CI 2.0 to 8.8) and very small or no pain reduction up to 2 years (mean difference =3.1, 95% CI -0.2 to 6.4) when compared with conservative management. With respect to function, the review identified moderate-certainty evidence that knee arthroscopy results in a very small improvement in the short term (mean difference =4.9 on a 100-point scale, 95% CI 1.5 to 8.4) and very small or no improved function up to 2 years (mean difference =3.2, 95% CI -0.5 to 6.8). Alternative presentations of magnitude of effect, and associated sensitivity analyses, were consistent with the findings of the primary analysis. Low-quality evidence suggested a very low probability of serious complications after knee arthroscopy.

Conclusions: Over the long term, patients who undergo knee arthroscopy versus those who receive conservative management strategies do not have important benefits in pain or function.

Trial registration number: PROSPERO CRD42016046242.

Keywords: GRADE; Osteoarthritis; arthritis; knee pain; meniscus tear.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection process. RCT, randomised clinical trial.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Mahir L, Belhaj K, Zahi S, et al. . Impact of knee osteoarthritis on the quality of life. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2016;59s:e159 10.1016/j.rehab.2016.07.355 - DOI
    1. Alkan BM, Fidan F, Tosun A, et al. . Quality of life and self-reported disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Mod Rheumatol 2014;24:166–71. 10.3109/14397595.2013.854046 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, et al. . Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:26–35. 10.1002/art.23176 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A. Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. Natl Health Stat Report 2009;Jan 28;(11):1–25. - PubMed
    1. Roos EM, Roos HP, Ryd L, et al. . Substantial disability 3 months after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: a prospective study of patient-relevant outcomes. Arthroscopy 2000;16:619–26. 10.1053/jars.2000.4818 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Related information

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
HighWire full text link HighWire Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp