DNA double-strand break repair in Penaeus monodon is predominantly dependent on homologous recombination
- PMID:28431013
- PMCID: PMC5397610
- DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsw059
DNA double-strand break repair in Penaeus monodon is predominantly dependent on homologous recombination
Abstract
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are mostly repaired by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) in higher eukaryotes. In contrast, HR-mediated DSB repair is the major double-strand break repair pathway in lower order organisms such as bacteria and yeast. Penaeus monodon, commonly known as black tiger shrimp, is one of the economically important crustaceans facing large-scale mortality due to exposure to infectious diseases. The animals can also get exposed to chemical mutagens under the culture conditions as well as in wild. Although DSB repair mechanisms have been described in mammals and some invertebrates, its mechanism is unknown in the shrimp species. In the present study, we show that HR-mediated DSB repair is the predominant mode of repair in P. monodon. Robust repair was observed at a temperature of 30 °C, when 2 µg of cell-free extract derived from hepatopancreas was used for the study. Although HR occurred through both reciprocal recombination and gene conversion, the latter was predominant when the bacterial colonies containing recombinants were evaluated. Unlike mammals, NHEJ-mediated DSB repair was undetectable in P. monodon. However, we could detect evidence for an alternative mode of NHEJ that uses microhomology, termed as microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ). Interestingly, unlike HR, MMEJ was predominant at lower temperatures. Therefore, the results suggest that, while HR is major DSB repair pathway in shrimp, MMEJ also plays a role in ensuring the continuity and stability of the genome.
Keywords: Double-strand break; MMEJ; Microhomology; Nonhomologous DNA end joining; homologous recombination.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Kazusa DNA Research Institute.
Figures









Similar articles
- Analysis of chromatid-break-repair detects a homologous recombination to non-homologous end-joining switch with increasing load of DNA double-strand breaks.Murmann-Konda T, Soni A, Stuschke M, Iliakis G.Murmann-Konda T, et al.Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2021 Jul;867:503372. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503372. Epub 2021 Jun 12.Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2021.PMID:34266628
- Efficient ligase 3-dependent microhomology-mediated end joining repair of DNA double-strand breaks in zebrafish embryos.He MD, Zhang FH, Wang HL, Wang HP, Zhu ZY, Sun YH.He MD, et al.Mutat Res. 2015 Oct;780:86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 20.Mutat Res. 2015.PMID:26318124
- Microhomology-mediated end joining: Good, bad and ugly.Seol JH, Shim EY, Lee SE.Seol JH, et al.Mutat Res. 2018 May;809:81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 16.Mutat Res. 2018.PMID:28754468Free PMC article.Review.
- Assays for DNA double-strand break repair by microhomology-based end-joining repair mechanisms.Kostyrko K, Mermod N.Kostyrko K, et al.Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Apr 7;44(6):e56. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1349. Epub 2015 Dec 10.Nucleic Acids Res. 2016.PMID:26657630Free PMC article.
- Contribution of Microhomology to Genome Instability: Connection between DNA Repair and Replication Stress.Jiang Y.Jiang Y.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 26;23(21):12937. doi: 10.3390/ijms232112937.Int J Mol Sci. 2022.PMID:36361724Free PMC article.Review.
References
- Srivastava M., Raghavan S.C.. 2015, DNA double-strand break repair inhibitors as cancer therapeutics. Chem. Biol., 22, 17–29. - PubMed
- Friedberg E.C., Aguilera A., Gellert M., et al. 2006, DNA repair: from molecular mechanism to human disease. DNA Repair, 5, 986–96. - PubMed
- Friedberg E.C., Backendorf C., Burke J., et al. 1987, Molecular aspects of DNA repair. Mutation Res, 184, 67–86. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources