Can MRI Visual Assessment Differentiate the Variants of Primary-Progressive Aphasia?
- PMID:28341715
- PMCID: PMC7960364
- DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5126
Can MRI Visual Assessment Differentiate the Variants of Primary-Progressive Aphasia?
Abstract
Background and purpose: Primary-progressive aphasia is a clinically and pathologically heterogeneous condition. Nonfluent, semantic, and logopenic are the currently recognized clinical variants. The recommendations for the classification of primary-progressive aphasia have advocated variant-specific patterns of atrophy. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the proposed imaging criteria and to assess the intra- and interrater reporting agreements.
Materials and methods: The cohort comprised 51 patients with a root diagnosis of primary-progressive aphasia, 25 patients with typical Alzheimer disease, and 26 matched control participants. Group-level analysis (voxel-based morphometry) confirmed the proposed atrophy patterns for the 3 syndromes. The individual T1-weighted anatomic images were reported by 3 senior neuroradiologists.
Results: We observed a dichotomized pattern of high sensitivity (92%) and specificity (93%) for the proposed atrophy pattern of semantic-variant primary-progressive aphasia and low sensitivity (21% for nonfluent-variant primary-progressive aphasia and 43% for logopenic-variant primary-progressive aphasia) but high specificity (91% for nonfluent-variant primary-progressive aphasia and 95% for logopenic-variant primary-progressive aphasia) in other primary-progressive aphasia variants and Alzheimer disease (sensitivity 43%, specificity 92%). MR imaging was least sensitive for the diagnosis of nonfluent-variant primary-progressive aphasia. Intrarater agreement analysis showed mean κ values above the widely accepted threshold of 0.6 (mean, 0.63 ± 0.16). Pair-wise interobserver agreement outcomes, however, were well below this threshold in 5 of the 6 possible interrater contrasts (mean, 0.41 ± 0.09).
Conclusions: While the group-level results were in precise agreement with the recommendations, semantic-variant primary-progressive aphasia was the only subtype for which the proposed recommendations were both sensitive and specific at an individual level.
© 2017 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.
Figures


Comment in
- FDG-PET/CT or MRI for the Diagnosis of Primary Progressive Aphasia?Matias-Guiu JA, Cabrera-Martín MN, Matías-Guiu J, Carreras JL.Matias-Guiu JA, et al.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Sep;38(9):E63. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5255. Epub 2017 May 25.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017.PMID:28546246Free PMC article.No abstract available.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical