Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Nature Publishing Group full text link Nature Publishing Group Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

doi: 10.1038/srep41956.

Mapping the distribution of specific antibody interaction forces on individual red blood cells

Affiliations

Mapping the distribution of specific antibody interaction forces on individual red blood cells

Natasha Yeow et al. Sci Rep..

Abstract

Current blood typing methods rely on the agglutination of red blood cells (RBCs) to macroscopically indicate a positive result. An indirect agglutination mechanism is required when blood typing with IgG forms of antibodies. To date, the interaction forces between anti-IgG and IgG antibodies have been poorly quantified, and blood group related antigens have never been quantified with the atomic force microscope (AFM). Instead, the total intensity resulting from fluorescent-tagged antibodies adsorbed on RBC has been measured to calculate an average antigen density on a series of RBCs. In this study we mapped specific antibody interaction forces on the RBC surface. AFM cantilever tips functionalized with anti-IgG were used to probe RBCs incubated with specific IgG antibodies. This work provides unique insight into antibody-antigen interactions in their native cell-bound location, and crucially, on a per-cell basis rather than an ensemble average set of properties. Force profiles obtained from the AFM directly provide not only the anti-IgG - IgG antibody interaction force, but also the spatial distribution and density of antigens over a single cell. This new understanding might be translated into the development of very selective and quantitative interactions that underpin the action of drugs in the treatment of frontier illnesses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the blood typing antibody system and the red blood cells (~8 μm).
(a) IgM has a large pentameric structure (35 nm) with 10 antigen binding sites and is active at room temperature while IgG has a monomeric structure (12 nm) with only 2 antigen binding sites and is active at body temperature (37 °C). IgM is able to directly agglutinate IgM-sensitized red blood cells. IgG antibodies require a bridging element, anti-IgG in this study, to form agglutinates of IgG-sensitized red blood cells. (b) Anti-IgG binds to the Fc region of IgG antibodies, enabling agglutination of IgG-sensitized red blood cells. Figures are not to scale.
Figure 2
Figure 2. RBC imaging in air.
(a) AFM images (1 μm × 1 μm) of RBC surface for blank, RBC incubated at 37 °C without antibodies and RBC incubated at 37 °C with selective antibodies. (b) Histograms of RMS roughness for different samples. (c) Fourier transform analysis for the different samples.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Force mapping in liquid.
(a) 3D model of AFM force work. (b) AFM cantilever tip functionalized with anti-IgG with RBCs attached to poly-L-lysine treated Petri dish surface.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Experimental results for force mapping.
(a) Typical force curve of a single specific interaction and (b) a non-interacting retraction. (c) Histograms of adhesion energies recorded from 1 μm2 and (0.1 μm)2 scan areas for D positive and negative samples. Black dotted lines represent the minimum threshold (0.25 × 10−17 J) for specific interactions. (de) Images showing a range of interaction energies (depicted by the colour scale) higher than 0.25 × 10−17 J on different points of the scan area. The typical size and potential conformation of IgG antibodies (green dotted lines) bound to the specific antigens is shown in (e).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Malomgré W. & Neumeister B. Recent and future trends in blood group typing. Anal Bioanal Chem 393, 1443–1451 (2009). - PubMed
    1. Qureshi R. Introduction to Transfusion Science Practice. 6 edn, (British Blood Transfusion Society, 2015).
    1. Jan K.-M. & Chien S. Role of Surface Electric Charge in Red Blood Cell Interactions. The Journal of General Physiology 61, 638–654, doi: 10.1085/jgp.61.5.638 (1973). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dao M., Lim C. T. & Suresh S. Mechanics of the human red blood cell deformed by optical tweezers. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 51, 2259–2280, doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2003.09.019 (2003). - DOI
    1. Saber R., Sarkar S., Gill P., Nazari B. & Faridani F. High resolution imaging of IgG and IgM molecules by scanning tunneling microscopy in air condition. Scientia Iranica 18, 1643–1646, doi: 10.1016/j.scient.2011.11.028 (2011). - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Nature Publishing Group full text link Nature Publishing Group Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp