Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Cambridge University Press full text link Cambridge University Press
Full text links

Actions

Randomized Controlled Trial
.2017 Apr;210(4):276-283.
doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.184234. Epub 2016 Dec 15.

Virtual reality compared within vivo exposure in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: a three-arm randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Virtual reality compared within vivo exposure in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: a three-arm randomised controlled trial

Stéphane Bouchard et al. Br J Psychiatry.2017 Apr.

Abstract

BackgroundPeople with social anxiety disorder (SAD) fear social interactions and may be reluctant to seek treatments involving exposure to social situations. Social exposure conducted in virtual reality (VR), embedded in individual cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), could be an answer.AimsTo show that conducting VR exposure in CBT for SAD is effective and is more practical for therapists than conducting exposurein vivoMethodParticipants were randomly assigned to either VR exposure (n = 17),in vivo exposure (n = 22) or waiting list (n = 20). Participants in the active arms received individual CBT for 14 weekly sessions and outcome was assessed with questionnaires and a behaviour avoidance test. (Trial registration number ISRCTN99747069)ResultsImprovements were found on the primary (Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale) and all five secondary outcome measures in both CBT groups compared with the waiting list. Conducting exposure in VR was more effective at post-treatment thanin vivo on the primary outcome measure and on one secondary measure. Improvements were maintained at the 6-month follow-up. VR was significantly more practical for therapists thanin vivo exposure.ConclusionsUsing VR can be advantageous over standard CBT as a potential solution for treatment avoidance and as an efficient, cost-effective and practical medium of exposure.

© The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2017.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Cambridge University Press full text link Cambridge University Press
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp