Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Wiley full text link Wiley Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

Randomized Controlled Trial
.2017 Jan;61(1):10.1002/mnfr.201500905.
doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201500905. Epub 2016 Sep 12.

Dietary supplementation with rice bran or navy bean alters gut bacterial metabolism in colorectal cancer survivors

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Dietary supplementation with rice bran or navy bean alters gut bacterial metabolism in colorectal cancer survivors

Amy M Sheflin et al. Mol Nutr Food Res.2017 Jan.

Abstract

Scope: Heat-stabilized rice bran (SRB) and cooked navy bean powder (NBP) contain a variety of phytochemicals that are fermented by colonic microbiota and may influence intestinal health. Dietary interventions with these foods should be explored for modulating colorectal cancer risk.

Methods and results: A randomized-controlled pilot clinical trial investigated the effects of eating SRB (30 g/day) or cooked navy bean powder (35 g/day) on gut microbiota and metabolites (NCT01929122). Twenty-nine overweight/obese volunteers with a prior history of colorectal cancer consumed a study-provided meal and snack daily for 28 days. Volunteers receiving SRB or NBP showed increased gut bacterial diversity and altered gut microbial composition at 28 days compared to baseline. Supplementation with SRB or NBP increased total dietary fiber intake similarly, yet only rice bran intake led to a decreased Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio and increased SCFA (propionate and acetate) in stool after 14 days but not at 28 days.

Conclusion: These findings support modulation of gut microbiota and fermentation byproducts by SRB and suggest that foods with similar ability to increase dietary fiber intake may not have equal effects on gut microbiota and microbial metabolism.

Keywords: Bile acids; Heat-stabilized rice bran; Navy bean; Short chain fatty acids; Stool microbiota.

© 2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors have no conflict of interest to declare for this research.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Stool bacterial diversity at days 0, 14, and 28 for SRB, NBP and control participants. All samples were normalized to 1157 sequences for each participant. Sobs = actual number OTUs detected (richness); Chao = estimated number OTUs (richness); SD = Simpson Diversity Index (lower values reflect higher diversity with this index). The table below the graphs lists data for each participant. The asterisk (*) indicates p < 0.05 with student’s t-test comparing time point to day 0.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SRB is associated with decreased Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio at 14 days relative to baseline, but not 28 days. The asterisk (*) indicates p< 0.05 with student’s t-test comparing time point to day 0.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Predicted differences in stool bacterial functional categories (PICRUSt)
Only KEGG categories found significant using STAMP analysis are shown, p<0.05.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Changes in stool short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) shown in a) Day 14 and b) Day 28. The asterisk (*) indicates p< 0.05 with Wilcoxon rank sum test comparing fold change relative to baseline to control.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Changes in stool short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) shown in a) Day 14 and b) Day 28. The asterisk (*) indicates p< 0.05 with Wilcoxon rank sum test comparing fold change relative to baseline to control.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Gingras D, Béliveau R. Colorectal cancer prevention through dietary and lifestyle modifications. Cancer Microenvironment. 2011;4:133–139. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bingham S. Diet and colorectal cancer prevention. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2000;28:12–16. - PubMed
    1. Marshall JR. Prevention of colorectal cancer: diet, chemoprevention, and lifestyle. Gastroenterology clinics of North America. 2008;37:73–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bennink M. Consumption of black beans and navy beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) reduced azoxymethane-induced colon cancer in rats. Nutr. Cancer. 2002;44:60–65. - PubMed
    1. Bobe G, Barrett KG, Mentor-Marcel RA, Saffiotti U, et al. Dietary cooked navy beans and their fractions attenuate colon carcinogenesis in azoxymethane-induced ob/ob mice. Nutr. Cancer. 2008;60:373–381. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

Related information

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Wiley full text link Wiley Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp