Meta-accuracy and relationship quality: Weighing the costs and benefits of knowing what people really think about you
- PMID:27337137
- PMCID: PMC4956493
- DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000107
Meta-accuracy and relationship quality: Weighing the costs and benefits of knowing what people really think about you
Abstract
People use metaperceptions, or their beliefs about how other people perceive them, to initiate and maintain social bonds. Are accurate metaperceptions associated with higher quality relationships? In four studies, the current research answers this question but considers the possibility that the self might not experience the same relational benefits of accurate metaperceptions, or meta-accuracy, as the people who form judgments about the self. For example, people tend to like individuals who have accurate self-perceptions, yet individuals tend to enjoy their own relationships more with people they believe see them in desirable ways. To test whether meta-accuracy is linked to relationship quality and whether this link differs for the self and others, meta-accuracy for personality traits as well as metaperceiver- and judge-reported relationship quality were assessed among new acquaintances (N = 184), peers (N = 228), friends (N = 273), and romantic partners (N = 401). Results suggested that judges enjoyed relationships more with metaperceivers who knew the impression they made, regardless of whether judges' impressions were desirable (i.e., positive or self-verifying). Initial meta-accuracy also predicted greater relationship quality over time, suggesting that accurate metaperceptions have positive effects on relationships. In contrast, rather than enjoying relationships more when they were accurate, metaperceivers enjoyed relationships more when they believed judges perceived them in positive or self-verifying ways. Thus, meta-accuracy seems to be a virtue in the eyes of judges, but metaperceivers do not seem to reap the same benefits of knowing what others really think. Implications for improving meta-accuracy are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record
(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
Similar articles
- Blissfully Blind or Painfully Aware? Exploring the Beliefs People With Interpersonal Problems Have About Their Reputation.Carlson EN, Wright AGC, Imam H.Carlson EN, et al.J Pers. 2017 Dec;85(6):757-768. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12284. Epub 2016 Oct 28.J Pers. 2017.PMID:27616308
- Who influences meta-accuracy? It takes two to know the impressions we make.Elsaadawy N, Carlson EN, Human LJ.Elsaadawy N, et al.J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Jul;121(1):201-214. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000376. Epub 2020 Nov 12.J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021.PMID:33180543
- Meta-accuracy among acquainted individuals: a social relations analysis of interpersonal perception and metaperception.Levesque MJ.Levesque MJ.J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Jan;72(1):66-74. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.72.1.66.J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997.PMID:9008375
- Do people know how others view them? Two approaches for identifying the accuracy of metaperceptions.Donnelly K, Moon A, Critcher CR.Donnelly K, et al.Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Feb;43:119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.018. Epub 2021 Jul 6.Curr Opin Psychol. 2022.PMID:34352724Review.
- A meta-analytic review of accuracy and bias in romantic partner perceptions.LaBuda JE, Gere J.LaBuda JE, et al.Psychol Bull. 2023 Sep-Oct;149(9-10):580-610. doi: 10.1037/bul0000405.Psychol Bull. 2023.PMID:38713750Review.
Cited by
- Eagerness and Optimistically Biased Metaperception: The More Eager to Learn Others' Evaluations, the Higher the Estimation of Others' Evaluations.Lu J, Duan H, Xie X.Lu J, et al.Front Psychol. 2018 May 15;9:715. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00715. eCollection 2018.Front Psychol. 2018.PMID:29867679Free PMC article.
- Consistency between individuals' past and current romantic partners' own reports of their personalities.Park Y, MacDonald G.Park Y, et al.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 25;116(26):12793-12797. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1902937116. Epub 2019 Jun 10.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019.PMID:31182593Free PMC article.
- Re-examining the factor structure of the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and defining the meaningful within-individual change (MWIC) for subjects with insomnia disorder in two phase III clinical trials of the efficacy of lemborexant.Lenderking WR, Savva Y, Atkinson MJ, Campbell R, Chabot I, Moline M, Meier G, Morin CM.Lenderking WR, et al.J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Jun 29;8(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00744-6.J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024.PMID:38951287Free PMC article.Clinical Trial.
- Do People Know How Their Romantic Partner Views Their Emotions? Evidence for Emotion Meta-Accuray and Links with Momentary Romantic Relationship Quality.Tissera H, Heyman JL, Human LJ.Tissera H, et al.Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Mar;49(3):391-404. doi: 10.1177/01461672211068225. Epub 2022 Jan 22.Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023.PMID:35067107Free PMC article.
- Meta-Accuracy of Very First Impressions: A Mini Review.Tsankova E, Tair E.Tsankova E, et al.Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 13;12:736534. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736534. eCollection 2021.Front Psychol. 2021.PMID:34721207Free PMC article.Review.
References
- Bates D, Sarkar D. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (R package Version 0.9975-12) [Computer soft- ware] 2007 Retrieved January 15, 2009, fromhttp://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html.
- Biesanz JC. The Social Accuracy Model of interpersonal perception: Assessing individual differences in perceptive and expressive accuracy. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2010;45:853–885. - PubMed
- Borkenau P, Zaltauskas K. Effects of self-enhancement on agreement on personality profiles. European Journal of Personality. 2009;23:107–123.
- Brett JF, Atwater LE. 360° feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001;86:930–942. - PubMed
- Boyes AD, Fletcher GJO. Metaperceptions of bias in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007;92:286–306. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical