Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Guidelines for and Against Clinical Preventive Services: Results from a National Survey
- PMID:26994709
- PMCID: PMC4941980
- DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12181
Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Guidelines for and Against Clinical Preventive Services: Results from a National Survey
Abstract
Policy points: Both the underuse and overuse of clinical preventive services relative to evidence-based guidelines are a public health concern. Informed consumers are an important foundation of many components of the Affordable Care Act, including coverage mandates for proven clinical preventive services recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force. Across sociodemographic groups, however, knowledge of and positive attitudes toward evidence-based guidelines for preventive care are extremely low. Given the demonstrated low levels of consumers' knowledge of and trust in guidelines, coupled with their strong preference for involvement in preventive care decisions, better education and decision-making support for evidence-based preventive services are greatly needed.
Context: Both the underuse and overuse of clinical preventive services are a serious public health problem. The goal of our study was to produce population-based national data that could assist in the design of communication strategies to increase knowledge of and positive attitudes toward evidence-based guidelines for clinical preventive services (including the US Preventive Services Task Force, USPSTF) and to reduce uncertainty among patients when guidelines change or are controversial.
Methods: In late 2013 we implemented an Internet-based survey of a nationally representative sample of 2,529 adults via KnowledgePanel, a probability-based survey panel of approximately 60,000 adults, statistically representative of the US noninstitutionalized population. African Americans, Hispanics, and those with less than a high school education were oversampled. We then conducted descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify the prevalence of and sociodemographic characteristics associated with key knowledge and attitudinal variables.
Findings: While 36.4% of adults reported knowing that the Affordable Care Act requires insurance companies to cover proven preventive services without cost sharing, only 7.7% had heard of the USPSTF. Approximately 1 in 3 (32.6%) reported trusting that a government task force would make fair guidelines for preventive services, and 38.2% believed that the government uses guidelines to ration health care. Most of the respondents endorsed the notion that research/scientific evidence and expert medical opinion are important for the creation of guidelines and that clinicians should follow guidelines based on evidence. But when presented with patient vignettes in which a physician made a guideline-based recommendation against a cancer-screening test, less than 10% believed that this recommendation alone, without further dialogue and/or the patient's own research, was sufficient to make such a decision.
Conclusions: Given these demonstrated low levels of knowledge and mistrust regarding guidelines, coupled with a strong preference for shared decision making, better consumer education and decision supports for evidence-based guidelines for clinical preventive services are greatly needed.
Keywords: clinical preventive services; evidence-based guidelines; patient engagement; survey research.
© 2016 Milbank Memorial Fund.
Similar articles
- Group health plans and health insurance issuers relating to coverage of preventive services under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Final rules.Internal Revenue Services, Department of the Treasury; Employee Benefits Security Administration, Department of Labor; Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services.Internal Revenue Services, Department of the Treasury, et al.Fed Regist. 2012 Feb 15;77(31):8725-30.Fed Regist. 2012.PMID:22379684
- Health plan implementation of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force A and B recommendations--Colorado, 2010.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Oct 7;60(39):1348-50.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011.PMID:21976117
- Physician Attitudes Toward Adult Vaccines and Other Preventive Practices, United States, 2012.Hurley LP, Bridges CB, Harpaz R, Allison MA, O' Leary ST, Crane LA, Brtnikova M, Stokley S, Beaty BL, Jimenez-Zambrano A, Kempe A.Hurley LP, et al.Public Health Rep. 2016 Mar-Apr;131(2):320-30. doi: 10.1177/003335491613100216.Public Health Rep. 2016.PMID:26957667Free PMC article.
- Recommendations of the IOM clinical preventive services for women committee: implications for obstetricians and gynecologists.Gee RE, Brindis CD, Diaz A, Garcia F, Gregory K, Peck MG, Reece EA.Gee RE, et al.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;23(6):471-80. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32834cdcc6.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011.PMID:22011955Review.
- Chlamydia screening for sexually active young women under the Affordable Care Act: new opportunities and lingering barriers.Loosier PS, Malcarney MB, Slive L, Cramer RC, Burgess B, Hoover KW, Romaguera R.Loosier PS, et al.Sex Transm Dis. 2014 Sep;41(9):538-44. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000170.Sex Transm Dis. 2014.PMID:25118966Free PMC article.Review.
Cited by
- Prevalence and Potential Consequences of Exposure to Conflicting Information about Mammography: Results from Nationally-Representative Survey of U.S. Adults.Gollust SE, Fowler EF, Nagler RH.Gollust SE, et al.Health Commun. 2023 Feb;38(2):349-362. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1951958. Epub 2021 Jul 14.Health Commun. 2023.PMID:34259097Free PMC article.
- Design and Feasibility of a Text Messaging Intervention to Prevent Indoor Tanning Among Young Adult Women: A Pilot Study.Evans WD, Mays D.Evans WD, et al.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Dec 22;4(4):e137. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6493.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016.PMID:28007691Free PMC article.
- Impact of Medicaid coverage expansion under the Affordable Care Act on mammography and pap tests utilization among low-income women.Alharbi AG, Khan MM, Horner R, Brandt H, Chapman C.Alharbi AG, et al.PLoS One. 2019 Apr 3;14(4):e0214886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214886. eCollection 2019.PLoS One. 2019.PMID:30943249Free PMC article.
- Characterising trusted spokespeople in noncommunicable disease prevention: A systematic scoping review.Demeshko A, Buckley L, Morphett K, Adams J, Meany R, Cullerton K.Demeshko A, et al.Prev Med Rep. 2022 Jul 28;29:101934. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101934. eCollection 2022 Oct.Prev Med Rep. 2022.PMID:35942296Free PMC article.
- Multisectoral Collaborations to Increase the Use of Recommended Cancer Screening and Other Clinical Preventive Services by Older Adults.Kietzman KG, Toy P, Bravo RL, Duru OK, Wallace SP.Kietzman KG, et al.Gerontologist. 2019 May 17;59(Suppl 1):S57-S66. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz004.Gerontologist. 2019.PMID:31100143Free PMC article.
References
- Koh HK, Sebelius KG. Promising prevention through the Affordable Care Act. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363:1296‐1299. - PubMed
- Carman KL, Mauer M, Yegian JM, et al. Evidence that consumers are skeptical about evidence‐based health care. Health Aff. 2010;29(7):1400‐1406. - PubMed
- Bensing J. Bridging the gap: the separate worlds of evidence‐based medicine and patient‐centered medicine. Patient Educ Counseling. 2000;39(1):17‐25. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical