Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Frontiers Media SA full text link Frontiers Media SA Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2016 Mar 1:7:278.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00278. eCollection 2016.

Sex Differences in Music: A Female Advantage at Recognizing Familiar Melodies

Affiliations

Sex Differences in Music: A Female Advantage at Recognizing Familiar Melodies

Scott A Miles et al. Front Psychol..

Abstract

Although sex differences have been observed in various cognitive domains, there has been little work examining sex differences in the cognition of music. We tested the prediction that women would be better than men at recognizing familiar melodies, since memories of specific melodies are likely to be learned (at least in part) by declarative memory, which shows female advantages. Participants were 24 men and 24 women, with half musicians and half non-musicians in each group. The two groups were matched on age, education, and various measures of musical training. Participants were presented with well-known and novel melodies, and were asked to indicate their recognition of familiar melodies as rapidly as possible. The women were significantly faster than the men in responding, with a large effect size. The female advantage held across musicians and non-musicians, and across melodies with and without commonly associated lyrics, as evidenced by an absence of interactions between sex and these factors. Additionally, the results did not seem to be explained by sex differences in response biases, or in basic motor processes as tested in a control task. Though caution is warranted given that this is the first study to examine sex differences in familiar melody recognition, the results are consistent with the hypothesis motivating our prediction, namely that declarative memory underlies knowledge about music (particularly about familiar melodies), and that the female advantage at declarative memory may thus lead to female advantages in music cognition (particularly at familiar melody recognition). Additionally, the findings argue against the view that female advantages at tasks involving verbal (or verbalizable) material are due solely to a sex difference specific to the verbal domain. Further, the results may help explain previously reported cognitive commonalities between music and language: since declarative memory also underlies language, such commonalities may be partly due to a common dependence on this memory system. More generally, because declarative memory is well studied at many levels, evidence that music cognition depends on this system may lead to a powerful research program generating a wide range of novel predictions for the neurocognition of music, potentially advancing the field.

Keywords: declarative memory; language; melody; music; music cognition; musical training; recognition; sex differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Mean recognition response times (log-transformed) and standard errors for well-known melodies, showing the main effect of sex (p < 0.0083, based on Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Besson M., Faïta F. (1995). An event-related potential (ERP) study of musical expectancy: comparison of musicians with nonmusicians.J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21 1278–1296. 10.1037/0096-1523.21.6.1278 - DOI
    1. Bharucha J. J. (1994). “Tonality and expectation,” inMusical Perceptions, eds Aiello R., Sloboda J. (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 213–239.
    1. Brown S., Martinez M. J., Parsons L. M. (2006). Music and language side by side in the brain: a PET study of the generation of melodies and sentences.Eur. J. Neurosci. 23 2791–2803. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04785.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cabeza R., Moscovitch M. (2013). Memory systems, processing modes, and components: functional neuroimaging evidence.Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 8 49–55. 10.1177/1745691612469033 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cassidy J. W., Ditty K. M. (2001). Gender differences among newborns on a transient otoacoustic emissions test for hearing.J. Music Ther. 38 28–35. 10.1093/jmt/38.1.28 - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Frontiers Media SA full text link Frontiers Media SA Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp