Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Silverchair Information Systems full text link Silverchair Information Systems Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

.2015 Apr 25;96(2):446-459.
doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyv049.

Molecular and morphologic data reveal multiple species inPeromyscus pectoralis

Affiliations

Molecular and morphologic data reveal multiple species inPeromyscus pectoralis

Robert D Bradley et al. J Mammal..

Abstract

DNA sequence and morphometric data were used to re-evaluate the taxonomy and systematics ofPeromyscus pectoralis. Phylogenetic analyses (maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference) of DNA sequences from the mitochondrial cytochrome-b gene in 44 samples ofP. pectoralis indicated 2 well-supported monophyletic clades. The 1st clade contained specimens from Texas historically assigned toP. p. laceianus; the 2nd was comprised of specimens previously referable toP. p. collinus,P. p. laceianus, andP. p. pectoralis obtained from northern and eastern Mexico. Levels of genetic variation (~7%) between these 2 clades indicated that the genetic divergence typically exceeded that reported for other species ofPeromyscus. Samples ofP. p. laceianus north and south of the Río Grande were not monophyletic. In addition, samples representingP. p. collinus andP. p. pectoralis formed 2 clades that differed genetically by 7.14%. Multivariate analyses of external and cranial measurements from 63 populations ofP. pectoralis revealed 4 morpho-groups consistent with clades in the DNA sequence analysis: 1 from Texas and New Mexico assignable toP. p. laceianus; a 2nd from western and southern Mexico assignable toP. p. pectoralis; a 3rd from northern and central Mexico previously assigned toP. p. pectoralis but herein shown to represent an undescribed taxon; and a 4th from southeastern Mexico assignable toP. p. collinus. Based on the concordance of these results, populations from the United States are referred to asP. laceianus, whereas populations from Mexico are referred to asP. pectoralis (including some samples historically assigned toP. p. collinus,P. p. laceianus, andP. p. pectoralis). A new subspecies is described to represent populations south of the Río Grande in northern and central Mexico. Additional research is needed to discern ifP. p. collinus warrants species recognition.

Keywords: DNA sequences; Peromyscus pectoralis; cytochrome-b gene; morphometrics; taxonomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Synoptic distribution maps, constructed from a consensus of specimens and conclusions obtained from Schmidly (1971, 1972), Kilpatrick and Zimmerman (1976), Hall (1981), and this study. Maps depict collecting localities (numbers), putative taxonomic assignment of samples (symbols), and proposed distribution for each taxon (shaded/stippled areas). Results relative to each analysis conducted in this study were overlaid onto a separate map: a) phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences from the mitochondrial cytochrome-b gene, b) multivariate analyses of morphologic data presented in Schmidly (1971, 1972), and c) allozymic analyses of Kilpatrick and Zimmerman (1976). Detailed information for collecting localities and individuals are provided in Appendix I and Tables 1 and 2.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Tree obtained from maximum likelihood analysis (MrBayes—Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001) and the GTR + I + G model of evolution. Capital letters refer to clades discussed in the text. Posterior probability values (0.95) are indicated by an asterisk (*) above the branches, whereas, bootstrap support values > 65% are indicated below branches. Individuals whose sequence was obtained from skin clips are denoted by a plus sign (+). Localities and specimen numbers are explained in Table 1 and Appendix I.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Phenogram obtained from the UPGMA cluster analysis using standardized population means for 5 external and 13 cranial measurements. Scale bar (at top) reflects average taxonomic distances. Capital letters refer to clusters discussed in the text. The cophenetic correlation coefficient for this phenogram was 0.717. Localities (corresponding to Tables 1 and 2, Fig. 1, and Appendix I) are indicated at the branch tips and asterisks (*) indicate samples from type or near type localities. Specimen information is found in Appendix I.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akaike H. 1974. The new look at statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19:716–723.
    1. Bailey V. 1906. A new white-footed mouse from Texas. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 19:57–58.
    1. Baker R. J., Bradley R. D. 2006. Speciation in mammals and the genetic species concept. Journal of Mammalogy 87:643–662. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barr A. J., Goodnight J. H., Sall J. P., Helwig J. T. 1976. A user’s guide to SAS 76. SAS Institute, Inc, Raleigh, North Carolina.
    1. Bradley R. D., Baker R. J. 2001. A test of the genetic species concept: cytochrome-b sequences and mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 82:960–973. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Silverchair Information Systems full text link Silverchair Information Systems Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp