Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

BioMed Central full text link BioMed Central Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

.2016 Feb 18:13:8.
doi: 10.1186/s12983-016-0141-5. eCollection 2016.

How to build your dragon: scaling of muscle architecture from the world's smallest to the world's largest monitor lizard

Affiliations

How to build your dragon: scaling of muscle architecture from the world's smallest to the world's largest monitor lizard

Taylor J M Dick et al. Front Zool..

Abstract

Background: The functional design of skeletal muscles is shaped by conflicting selective pressures between support and propulsion, which becomes even more important as animals get larger. If larger animals were geometrically scaled up versions of smaller animals, increases in body size would cause an increase in musculoskeletal stress, a result of the greater scaling of mass in comparison to area. In large animals these stresses would come dangerously close to points of failure. By examining the architecture of 22 hindlimb muscles in 27 individuals from 9 species of varanid lizards ranging from the tiny 7.6 g Varanus brevicauda to the giant 40 kg Varanus komodoensis, we present a comprehensive dataset on the scaling of musculoskeletal architecture in monitor lizards (varanids), providing information about the phylogenetic constraints and adaptations of locomotor muscles in sprawling tetrapods.

Results: Scaling results for muscle mass, pennation and physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA), all suggest that larger varanids increase the relative force-generating capacity of femur adductors, knee flexors and ankle plantarflexors, with scaling exponents greater than geometric similarity predicts. Thus varanids mitigate the size-related increases in stress by increasing muscle mass and PCSA rather than adopting a more upright posture with size as is shown in other animals. As well as the scaling effects of muscle properties with body mass, the variation in muscle architecture with changes in hindlimb posture were also prominent. Within varanids, posture varies with habitat preference. Climbing lizards display a sprawling posture while terrestrial lizards display a more upright posture. Sprawling species required larger PCSAs and muscle masses in femur retractors, knee flexors, and ankle plantarflexors in order to support the body.

Conclusions: Both size and posture-related muscle changes all suggest an increased role in support over propulsion, leading to a decrease in locomotor performance which has previously been shown with increases in size. These estimates suggest the giant Pleistocene varanid lizard (Varanus megalania priscus) would likely not have been able to outrun early humans with which it co-habitated the Australian landmass with.

Keywords: Locomotion; Morphology; Musculoskeletal; Varanus; komodoensis; priscus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Phylogeny of varanids used in the current study, based on Thompson et al. [55], with the scale bar indicating substitutions per site. Average body lengths for each species is indicated as the length of the line under each silhouette. Approximate body size of a human is added for comparison to scale
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Varanid hindlimb muscle architecture.a Dorsal superficial,b Ventral superficial,c Dorsal deep (ILTIB removed),d Ventral deep (PIT removed). Apo. – Aponeurosis; D-dorsal; S-superficial; Ten. – tendon; V-ventral
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Scaling exponents for muscle properties versus body mass. The boxes represent the slopes and 95 % confidence intervals of the species mean RMA lines for log transformed muscle properties: muscle mass, PCSA, and fascicle length. Horizontal lines show predictions based on geometric scaling at M0.33 (length), M0.66 (area), M1.0 (mass)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Performance space plot (fascicle length (Lf) verses PCSA, normalised by the appropriate scaling exponents for body mass) for each hindlimb muscle. Species means are represented for each muscle where the size of the symbol indicates the mean body mass and the shape of the symbol represents different muscles for each species. A general overview for all muscles is shown inc, and is separated into functional groups in panelsa-b,d-f
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Galilei G. Two New Sciences (translated by S. Drake 1974). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press; 1638.
    1. Hill AV. The dimensions of animals and their muscular dynamics. Sci Prog (1933-) 1950;38(150):209–30.
    1. Lieber RL, Friden J. Functional and clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture. Muscle Nerve. 2000;23:1647–66. doi: 10.1002/1097-4598(200011)23:11<1647::AID-MUS1>3.0.CO;2-M. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Biewener AA. Biomechanical consequences of scaling. J Exp Biol. 2005;208(9):1665–76. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01520. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McMahon TA. Size and shape in biology. Science. 1973;179:1201–4. doi: 10.1126/science.179.4079.1201. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
BioMed Central full text link BioMed Central Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp