Developing a new justification for assent
- PMID:26754555
- PMCID: PMC4709867
- DOI: 10.1186/s12910-015-0085-x
Developing a new justification for assent
Abstract
Background: Current guidelines do not clearly outline when assent should be attained from paediatric research participants, nor do they detail the necessary elements of the assent process. This stems from the fact that the fundamental justification behind the concept of assent is misunderstood. In this paper, we critically assess three widespread ethical arguments used for assent: children's rights, the best interests of the child, and respect for a child's developing autonomy. We then outline a newly-developed two-fold justification for the assent process: respect for the parent's pedagogical role in teaching their child to become an autonomous being and respect for the child's moral worth.
Discussion: We argue that the ethical grounding for the involvement of young children in medical decision-making does not stem from children's rights, the principle of best interests, or respect for developing autonomy. An alternative strategy is to examine the original motivation to engage with the child. In paediatric settings there are two obligations on the researcher: an obligation to the parents who are responsible for determining when and under what circumstances the child develops his capacity for autonomy and reasoning, and an obligation to the child himself. There is an important distinction between respecting a decision and encouraging a decision. This paper illustrates that the process of assent is an important way in which respect for the child as an individual can be demonstrated, however, the value lies not in the child's response but the fact that his views were solicited in the first place. This paper demonstrates that the common justifications for the process of assent are incomplete. Assent should be understood as playing a pedagogical role for the child, helping to teach him how specific decisions are made and therefore helping him to become a better decision-maker. How the researcher engages with the child supports his obligation to the child's parents, yet why the researcher engages with the child stems from the child's moral worth. Treating a child as having moral worth need not mean doing what they say but it may mean listening, considering, engaging or involving them in the decision.
Similar articles
- Development of a consensus operational definition of child assent for research.Tait AR, Geisser ME.Tait AR, et al.BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Jun 9;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0199-4.BMC Med Ethics. 2017.PMID:28599638Free PMC article.
- Child's assent in research: age threshold or personalisation?Waligora M, Dranseika V, Piasecki J.Waligora M, et al.BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Jun 13;15:44. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-44.BMC Med Ethics. 2014.PMID:24923433Free PMC article.
- Parents' attitudes towards and perceptions of involving minors in medical research from the Japanese perspective.Fukuda Y, Fukuda K.Fukuda Y, et al.BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Nov 21;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0330-1.BMC Med Ethics. 2018.PMID:30463554Free PMC article.
- Consent and assent in paediatric research in low-income settings.Cheah PY, Parker M.Cheah PY, et al.BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Mar 5;15:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-22.BMC Med Ethics. 2014.PMID:24597948Free PMC article.
- Assent for children's participation in research: why it matters and making it meaningful.Oulton K, Gibson F, Sell D, Williams A, Pratt L, Wray J.Oulton K, et al.Child Care Health Dev. 2016 Jul;42(4):588-97. doi: 10.1111/cch.12344. Epub 2016 May 2.Child Care Health Dev. 2016.PMID:27133591Review.
Cited by
- Assent and consent in pediatric and adolescent research: school children's perspectives.Al-Sheyab NA, Alomari MA, Khabour OF, Shattnawi KK, Alzoubi KH.Al-Sheyab NA, et al.Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2019 Feb 11;10:7-14. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S185553. eCollection 2019.Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2019.PMID:30804694Free PMC article.
- Ethical Aspects of Personalized Research and Management of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) in Children.Groff E, Orzechowski M, Schuetz C, Steger F.Groff E, et al.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 28;20(1):470. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010470.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022.PMID:36612792Free PMC article.
- Development of a consensus operational definition of child assent for research.Tait AR, Geisser ME.Tait AR, et al.BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Jun 9;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0199-4.BMC Med Ethics. 2017.PMID:28599638Free PMC article.
- What information and the extent of information to be provided in an informed assent/consent form of pediatric drug trials.Koonrungsesomboon N, Charoenkwan P, Natesirinilkul R, Fanhchaksai K, Sakuludomkan W, Morakote N.Koonrungsesomboon N, et al.BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Nov 16;23(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00856-y.BMC Med Ethics. 2022.PMID:36384589Free PMC article.
- Paediatric biobanking for health: The ethical, legal, and societal landscape.Casati S, Ellul B, Mayrhofer MT, Lavitrano M, Caboux E, Kozlakidis Z.Casati S, et al.Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 27;10:917615. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.917615. eCollection 2022.Front Public Health. 2022.PMID:36238242Free PMC article.Review.
References
- Public Welfare, Protection of Human Subjects. 45 CFR § 46.402. 2005.
- Nuffield Council on Bioethics . Children and clinical research: ethical issues. 2015.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical