Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

Randomized Controlled Trial
.2016 Mar 5;387(10022):945-956.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01224-6. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial

Ian J Jacobs  1Usha Menon  2Andy Ryan  3Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj  3Matthew Burnell  3Jatinderpal K Kalsi  3Nazar N Amso  4Sophia Apostolidou  3Elizabeth Benjamin  5Derek Cruickshank  6Danielle N Crump  3Susan K Davies  3Anne Dawnay  7Stephen Dobbs  8Gwendolen Fletcher  3Jeremy Ford  9Keith Godfrey  10Richard Gunu  3Mariam Habib  11Rachel Hallett  12Jonathan Herod  13Howard Jenkins  14Chloe Karpinskyj  3Simon Leeson  15Sara J Lewis  3William R Liston  3Alberto Lopes  16Tim Mould  17John Murdoch  18David Oram  19Dustin J Rabideau  20Karina Reynolds  19Ian Scott  14Mourad W Seif  21Aarti Sharma  22Naveena Singh  23Julie Taylor  3Fiona Warburton  24Martin Widschwendter  3Karin Williamson  25Robert Woolas  26Lesley Fallowfield  27Alistair J McGuire  28Stuart Campbell  29Mahesh Parmar  30Steven J Skates  31
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial

Ian J Jacobs et al. Lancet..

Erratum in

  • Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):944
  • Department of Error.
    [No authors listed][No authors listed]Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):944. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00228-2. Epub 2016 Jan 30.Lancet. 2016.PMID:28832000Free PMC article.No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: Ovarian cancer has a poor prognosis, with just 40% of patients surviving 5 years. We designed this trial to establish the effect of early detection by screening on ovarian cancer mortality.

Methods: In this randomised controlled trial, we recruited postmenopausal women aged 50-74 years from 13 centres in National Health Service Trusts in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Exclusion criteria were previous bilateral oophorectomy or ovarian malignancy, increased risk of familial ovarian cancer, and active non-ovarian malignancy. The trial management system confirmed eligibility and randomly allocated participants in blocks of 32 using computer-generated random numbers to annual multimodal screening (MMS) with serum CA125 interpreted with use of the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm, annual transvaginal ultrasound screening (USS), or no screening, in a 1:1:2 ratio. The primary outcome was death due to ovarian cancer by Dec 31, 2014, comparing MMS and USS separately with no screening, ascertained by an outcomes committee masked to randomisation group. All analyses were by modified intention to screen, excluding the small number of women we discovered after randomisation to have a bilateral oophorectomy, have ovarian cancer, or had exited the registry before recruitment. Investigators and participants were aware of screening type. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numberNCT00058032.

Findings: Between June 1, 2001, and Oct 21, 2005, we randomly allocated 202,638 women: 50,640 (25·0%) to MMS, 50,639 (25·0%) to USS, and 101,359 (50·0%) to no screening. 202,546 (>99·9%) women were eligible for analysis: 50,624 (>99·9%) women in the MMS group, 50,623 (>99·9%) in the USS group, and 101,299 (>99·9%) in the no screening group. Screening ended on Dec 31, 2011, and included 345,570 MMS and 327,775 USS annual screening episodes. At a median follow-up of 11·1 years (IQR 10·0-12·0), we diagnosed ovarian cancer in 1282 (0·6%) women: 338 (0·7%) in the MMS group, 314 (0·6%) in the USS group, and 630 (0·6%) in the no screening group. Of these women, 148 (0·29%) women in the MMS group, 154 (0·30%) in the USS group, and 347 (0·34%) in the no screening group had died of ovarian cancer. The primary analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model gave a mortality reduction over years 0-14 of 15% (95% CI -3 to 30; p=0·10) with MMS and 11% (-7 to 27; p=0·21) with USS. The Royston-Parmar flexible parametric model showed that in the MMS group, this mortality effect was made up of 8% (-20 to 31) in years 0-7 and 23% (1-46) in years 7-14, and in the USS group, of 2% (-27 to 26) in years 0-7 and 21% (-2 to 42) in years 7-14. A prespecified analysis of death from ovarian cancer of MMS versus no screening with exclusion of prevalent cases showed significantly different death rates (p=0·021), with an overall average mortality reduction of 20% (-2 to 40) and a reduction of 8% (-27 to 43) in years 0-7 and 28% (-3 to 49) in years 7-14 in favour of MMS.

Interpretation: Although the mortality reduction was not significant in the primary analysis, we noted a significant mortality reduction with MMS when prevalent cases were excluded. We noted encouraging evidence of a mortality reduction in years 7-14, but further follow-up is needed before firm conclusions can be reached on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of ovarian cancer screening.

Funding: Medical Research Council, Cancer Research UK, Department of Health, The Eve Appeal.

Copyright © 2016 Jacobs Menon et al. Open Access article published under the terms of CC BY. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile MMS=multimodal screening. USS=ultrasound screening. *Events occurred before recruitment, but discovered after randomisation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Cumulative ovarian cancer and (B) ovarian and peritoneal cancer deaths The Royston-Parmar model is shown in the appendix (p 12, 13). HR=hazard ratio. MMS=multimodal screening. USS=ultrasound screening.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Rates of ovarian cancer The figure including confidence limits is in the appendix (p 14). MMS=multimodal screening. USS=ultrasound screening.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Cumulative ovarian cancer and (B) ovarian and peritoneal deaths in MMS and no screening groups after exclusion of prevalent cases HRs and mortality reductions for 0–7 years and 7–14 years calculated from the Royston-Parmar model. Cumulative mortality curves from the Royston-Parmar model are overlaid onto Kaplan-Meier curves. HR=hazard ratio. MMS=multimodal screening.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Cancer Research UK. Ovarian cancer survival statistics. One-, five- and ten-year survival for ovarian cancer.http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/st... (accessed Nov 3, 2015)
    1. Jacobs I, Stabile I, Bridges J, et al. Multimodal approach to screening for ovarian cancer. Lancet. 1988;1:268–271. - PubMed
    1. Jacobs IJ, Skates S, Davies AP, et al. Risk of diagnosis of ovarian cancer after raised serum CA 125 concentration: a prospective cohort study. BMJ. 1996;313:1355–1358. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Menon U, Talaat A, Jeyarajah AR, et al. Ultrasound assessment of ovarian cancer risk in postmenopausal women with CA125 elevation. Br J Cancer. 1999;80:1644–1647. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jacobs IJ, Skates SJ, MacDonald N, et al. Screening for ovarian cancer: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1999;353:1207–1210. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data

Related information

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp