Quantitative Analysis of Lysobacter Predation
- PMID:26231654
- PMCID: PMC4579460
- DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01781-15
Quantitative Analysis of Lysobacter Predation
Abstract
Bacteria of the genus Lysobacter are considered to be facultative predators that use a feeding strategy similar to that of myxobacteria. Experimental data supporting this assumption, however, are scarce. Therefore, the predatory activities of three Lysobacter species were tested in the prey spot plate assay and in the lawn predation assay, which are commonly used to analyze myxobacterial predation. Surprisingly, only one of the tested Lysobacter species showed predatory behavior in the two assays. This result suggested that not all Lysobacter strains are predatory or, alternatively, that the assays were not appropriate for determining the predatory potential of this bacterial group. To differentiate between the two scenarios, predation was tested in a CFU-based bioassay. For this purpose, defined numbers of Lysobacter cells were mixed together with potential prey bacteria featuring phenotypic markers, such as distinctive pigmentation or antibiotic resistance. After 24 h, cocultivated cells were streaked out on agar plates and sizes of bacterial populations were individually determined by counting the respective colonies. Using the CFU-based predation assay, we observed that Lysobacter spp. strongly antagonized other bacteria under nutrient-deficient conditions. Simultaneously, the Lysobacter population was increasing, which together with the killing of the cocultured bacteria indicated predation. Variation of the predator/prey ratio revealed that all three Lysobacter species tested needed to outnumber their prey for efficient predation, suggesting that they exclusively practiced group predation. In summary, the CFU-based predation assay not only enabled the quantification of prey killing and consumption by Lysobacter spp. but also provided insights into their mode of predation.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Figures





Similar articles
- RETRACTED: Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial.Gautret P, Lagier JC, Parola P, Hoang VT, Meddeb L, Mailhe M, Doudier B, Courjon J, Giordanengo V, Vieira VE, Tissot Dupont H, Honoré S, Colson P, Chabrière E, La Scola B, Rolain JM, Brouqui P, Raoult D.Gautret P, et al.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Jul;56(1):105949. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949. Epub 2020 Mar 20.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020.Retraction in:Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2025 Jan;65(1):107416. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107416.PMID:32205204Free PMC article.Retracted.Clinical Trial.
- Ceftazidime with avibactam for treating severe aerobic Gram-negative bacterial infections: technology evaluation to inform a novel subscription-style payment model.Harnan S, Kearns B, Scope A, Schmitt L, Jankovic D, Hamilton J, Srivastava T, Hill H, Ku CC, Ren S, Rothery C, Bojke L, Sculpher M, Woods B.Harnan S, et al.Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(73):1-230. doi: 10.3310/YAPL9347.Health Technol Assess. 2024.PMID:39487661Free PMC article.
- Defining the optimum strategy for identifying adults and children with coeliac disease: systematic review and economic modelling.Elwenspoek MM, Thom H, Sheppard AL, Keeney E, O'Donnell R, Jackson J, Roadevin C, Dawson S, Lane D, Stubbs J, Everitt H, Watson JC, Hay AD, Gillett P, Robins G, Jones HE, Mallett S, Whiting PF.Elwenspoek MM, et al.Health Technol Assess. 2022 Oct;26(44):1-310. doi: 10.3310/ZUCE8371.Health Technol Assess. 2022.PMID:36321689Free PMC article.
- Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.Bryant A, Hiu S, Kunonga PT, Gajjar K, Craig D, Vale L, Winter-Roach BA, Elattar A, Naik R.Bryant A, et al.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022.PMID:36161421Free PMC article.Review.
- Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use.Lindson-Hawley N, Hartmann-Boyce J, Fanshawe TR, Begh R, Farley A, Lancaster T.Lindson-Hawley N, et al.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 13;10(10):CD005231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005231.pub3.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016.PMID:27734465Free PMC article.Review.
Cited by
- Predatory bacteria as potential biofilm control and eradication agents in the food industry.Mun W, Choi SY, Upatissa S, Mitchell RJ.Mun W, et al.Food Sci Biotechnol. 2023 May 4;32(12):1729-1743. doi: 10.1007/s10068-023-01310-4. eCollection 2023 Oct.Food Sci Biotechnol. 2023.PMID:37780591Free PMC article.Review.
- Antibiotics from predatory bacteria.Korp J, Vela Gurovic MS, Nett M.Korp J, et al.Beilstein J Org Chem. 2016 Mar 30;12:594-607. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.12.58. eCollection 2016.Beilstein J Org Chem. 2016.PMID:27340451Free PMC article.Review.
- Effects of Organic-Loading-Rate Reduction on Sludge Biomass and Microbial Community in a Deteriorated Pilot-Scale Membrane Bioreactor.Sato Y, Hori T, Navarro RR, Naganawa R, Habe H, Ogata A.Sato Y, et al.Microbes Environ. 2016 Sep 29;31(3):361-4. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME16015. Epub 2016 Jul 12.Microbes Environ. 2016.PMID:27431196Free PMC article.
- The potential of facultative predatoryActinomycetota spp. and prospects in agricultural sustainability.Ibrahimi M, Loqman S, Jemo M, Hafidi M, Lemee L, Ouhdouch Y.Ibrahimi M, et al.Front Microbiol. 2023 Jan 25;13:1081815. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1081815. eCollection 2022.Front Microbiol. 2023.PMID:36762097Free PMC article.Review.
- Myxobacterial Predation: A Standardised Lawn Predation Assay Highlights Strains with Unusually Efficient Predatory Activity.Zwarycz AS, Whitworth DE.Zwarycz AS, et al.Microorganisms. 2023 Feb 4;11(2):398. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020398.Microorganisms. 2023.PMID:36838363Free PMC article.
References
- Lidicker WZ., Jr 1979. A clarification of interactions in ecological systems. Bioscience 29:475–477. doi:10.2307/1307540. - DOI
- Abrams PA. 2000. The evolution of predator-prey interactions: theory and evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:79–105. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.79. - DOI
- Jurkevitch E, Davidov Y. 2007. Phylogenetic diversity and evolution of predatory prokaryotes, p 1–56. In Jurkevitch E. (ed), Predatory prokaryotes—biology, ecology, and evolution. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Davidov Y, Jurkevitch E. 2004. Diversity and evolution of Bdellovibrio-and-like organisms (BALOs), reclassification of Bacteriovorax starrii as Peredibacterstarrii gen. nov., comb. nov., and description of the Bacteriovorax-Peredibacter clade as Bacteriovoracaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:1439–1452. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.02978-0. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous