Commentary on "A Role for the X Chromosome in Sex Differences in Variability in General Intelligence?" (Johnson et al., 2009)
- PMID:26161737
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01170.x
Commentary on "A Role for the X Chromosome in Sex Differences in Variability in General Intelligence?" (Johnson et al., 2009)
Abstract
Johnson et al.'s (2009) article highlights the role of X-chromosomal genes in general intelligence and draws attention to their potential role in explaining the observed greater variance for this trait in males and their excess at both extremes of the distribution. We note that this would result from a simple additive effect of X-linked intelligence genes and also discuss the potentially important contribution of recessive deleterious loci. The buffering effect of heterozygosity in females will be partly constrained by the skewing of X-inactivation patterns increasing the variance of females beyond what is expected. Furthermore, escape of some X-linked genes from in-activation may also be relevant to male-female variance comparisons. We also comment on the difficulty of establishing the extent to which the X chromosome is enriched for intelligence genes and point out that their estimates of the proportion of genes influencing general intelligence that might be located on the X chromosome rely on some doubtful premises, especially concerning the likely equivalence of X-linked gene action in males and females. Finally, we discuss the increasingly compelling evidence for the accumulation of genes on the X chromosome that have selective benefit to males, including those implicated infertility and some manifestations of intelligence.
© 2009 Association for Psychological Science.
Similar articles
- A Role for the X Chromosome in Sex Differences in Variability in General Intelligence?Johnson W, Carothers A, Deary IJ.Johnson W, et al.Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Nov;4(6):598-611. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01168.x.Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009.PMID:26161735
- Sex Differences in Variability for Cognitive Measures: Do the Ends Justify the Genes? (Commentary on Johnson et al., 2009).Turkheimer E, Halpern DF.Turkheimer E, et al.Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Nov;4(6):612-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01169.x.Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009.PMID:26161736
- Understanding the Landscape of X-linked Variants Causing Intellectual Disability in Females Through Extreme X Chromosome Inactivation Skewing.Vianna EQ, Piergiorge RM, Gonçalves AP, Dos Santos JM, Calassara V, Rosenberg C, Krepischi ACV, Boy da Silva RT, Dos Santos SR, Ribeiro MG, Machado FB, Medina-Acosta E, Pimentel MMG, Santos-Rebouças CB.Vianna EQ, et al.Mol Neurobiol. 2020 Sep;57(9):3671-3684. doi: 10.1007/s12035-020-01981-8. Epub 2020 Jun 20.Mol Neurobiol. 2020.PMID:32564284
- Genes that escape from X-chromosome inactivation: Potential contributors to Klinefelter syndrome.Navarro-Cobos MJ, Balaton BP, Brown CJ.Navarro-Cobos MJ, et al.Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2020 Jun;184(2):226-238. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31800. Epub 2020 May 22.Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2020.PMID:32441398Free PMC article.Review.
- Escape From X-Chromosome Inactivation: An Evolutionary Perspective.Posynick BJ, Brown CJ.Posynick BJ, et al.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019 Oct 22;7:241. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00241. eCollection 2019.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019.PMID:31696116Free PMC article.Review.
Cited by
- Greater male than female variability in regional brain structure across the lifespan.Wierenga LM, Doucet GE, Dima D, Agartz I, Aghajani M, Akudjedu TN, Albajes-Eizagirre A, Alnaes D, Alpert KI, Andreassen OA, Anticevic A, Asherson P, Banaschewski T, Bargallo N, Baumeister S, Baur-Streubel R, Bertolino A, Bonvino A, Boomsma DI, Borgwardt S, Bourque J, den Braber A, Brandeis D, Breier A, Brodaty H, Brouwer RM, Buitelaar JK, Busatto GF, Calhoun VD, Canales-Rodríguez EJ, Cannon DM, Caseras X, Castellanos FX, Chaim-Avancini TM, Ching CR, Clark VP, Conrod PJ, Conzelmann A, Crivello F, Davey CG, Dickie EW, Ehrlich S, Van't Ent D, Fisher SE, Fouche JP, Franke B, Fuentes-Claramonte P, de Geus EJ, Di Giorgio A, Glahn DC, Gotlib IH, Grabe HJ, Gruber O, Gruner P, Gur RE, Gur RC, Gurholt TP, de Haan L, Haatveit B, Harrison BJ, Hartman CA, Hatton SN, Heslenfeld DJ, van den Heuvel OA, Hickie IB, Hoekstra PJ, Hohmann S, Holmes AJ, Hoogman M, Hosten N, Howells FM, Hulshoff Pol HE, Huyser C, Jahanshad N, James AC, Jiang J, Jönsson EG, Joska JA, Kalnin AJ; Karolinska Schizophrenia Project (KaSP) Consortium; Klein M, Koenders L, Kolskår KK, Krämer B, Kuntsi J, Lagopoulos J, Lazaro L, Lebedeva IS, Lee PH, Lochner C, Machielsen MW, Maingault S, Martin NG, Martínez-Zalacaín I, Mataix-Co…See abstract for full author list ➔Wierenga LM, et al.Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Jan;43(1):470-499. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25204. Epub 2020 Oct 12.Hum Brain Mapp. 2022.PMID:33044802Free PMC article.
- Sex Differences in the Adult Human Brain: Evidence from 5216 UK Biobank Participants.Ritchie SJ, Cox SR, Shen X, Lombardo MV, Reus LM, Alloza C, Harris MA, Alderson HL, Hunter S, Neilson E, Liewald DCM, Auyeung B, Whalley HC, Lawrie SM, Gale CR, Bastin ME, McIntosh AM, Deary IJ.Ritchie SJ, et al.Cereb Cortex. 2018 Aug 1;28(8):2959-2975. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy109.Cereb Cortex. 2018.PMID:29771288Free PMC article.
- Brain asymmetry is globally different in males and females: exploring cortical volume, area, thickness, and mean curvature.Dumitru ML.Dumitru ML.Cereb Cortex. 2023 Dec 9;33(24):11623-11633. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad396.Cereb Cortex. 2023.PMID:37851852Free PMC article.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources