Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2015 Mar 1;40(2):199-226.
doi: 10.1177/0162243914554838.

Feeding and Bleeding: The Institutional Banalization of Risk to Healthy Volunteers in Phase I Pharmaceutical Clinical Trials

Affiliations

Feeding and Bleeding: The Institutional Banalization of Risk to Healthy Volunteers in Phase I Pharmaceutical Clinical Trials

Jill A Fisher. Sci Technol Human Values..

Abstract

Phase I clinical trials are the first stage of testing new pharmaceuticals in humans. The majority of these studies are conducted under controlled, inpatient conditions using healthy volunteers who are paid for their participation. This article draws on an ethnographic study of six phase I clinics in the United States, including 268 semistructured interviews with research staff and healthy volunteers. In it, I argue that an institutional banalization of risk structures the perceptions of research staff and healthy volunteers participating in the studies. For research staff, there are three mechanisms by which risk becomes banal: a perceived homogeneity of studies, Fordist work regimes, and data-centric discourse. For healthy volunteers, repeat study participation contributes to the institutional banalization of risk both through the process of desensitization to risk and the formation of trust in the clinics. I argue that the institutional banalization of risk also renders invisible ethical concerns about exploitation of underprivileged groups in pharmaceutical research.

Keywords: clinical trials; healthy volunteers; pharmaceuticals; phase I; risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abadie R. The Professional Guinea Pig: Big Pharma and the Risky World of Human Subjects. Duke University Press; Durham, NC: 2010.
    1. Batchelor S. [Accessed October 1, 2014];Feds May Track Sex Differences in Drug Reactions. Women’s eNews. 2002 Sep 15;http://womensenews.org/story/medicine/020915/feds-may-track-sex-differen...
    1. Beck U. From Industrial Society to the Risk Society: Questions of Survival, Social Structure and Ecological Enlightenment. Theory, Culture & Society. 1992;9(1):97–123.
    1. [Accessed April 7, 2012];Belmont Report. 1979http://ohsr.Od.Nih.Gov/guidelines/belmont.Html
    1. Borfitz D. Canada Scrambles to Reboot Sagging Clinical Trials Market. CenterWatch Monthly. 2011;18(12):1, 10–14.

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp