Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

BioMed Central full text link BioMed Central Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

.2015 Mar 4:15:36.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0421-1.

The development and validation of the Youth Actuarial Care Needs Assessment Tool for Non-Offenders (Y-ACNAT-NO)

Affiliations

The development and validation of the Youth Actuarial Care Needs Assessment Tool for Non-Offenders (Y-ACNAT-NO)

Mark Assink et al. BMC Psychiatry..

Abstract

Background: In The Netherlands, police officers not only come into contact with juvenile offenders, but also with a large number of juveniles who were involved in a criminal offense, but not in the role of a suspect (i.e., juvenile non-offenders). Until now, no valid and reliable instrument was available that can be used by Dutch police officers for estimating the risk for future care needs of juvenile non-offenders. In the present study, the Youth Actuarial Care Needs Assessment Tool for Non-Offenders (Y-ACNAT-NO) was developed for predicting the risk for future care needs that consisted of (1) a future supervision order as imposed by a juvenile court judge and (2) future worrisome incidents involving child abuse, domestic violence/strife, and/or sexual offensive behavior at the juvenile's living address (i.e., problems in the child-rearing environment).

Methods: Police records of 3,200 juveniles were retrieved from the Dutch police registration system after which the sample was randomly split in a construction (n = 1,549) and validation sample (n = 1,651). The Y-ACNAT-NO was developed by performing an Exhaustive CHAID analysis using the construction sample. The predictive validity of the instrument was examined in the validation sample by calculating several performance indicators that assess discrimination and calibration.

Results: The CHAID output yielded an instrument that consisted of six variables and eleven different risk groups. The risk for future care needs ranged from 0.06 in the lowest risk group to 0.83 in the highest risk group. The AUC value in the validation sample was .764 (95% CI [.743, .784]) and Sander's calibration score indicated an average assessment error of 3.74% in risk estimates per risk category.

Conclusions: The Y-ACNAT-NO is the first instrument that can be used by Dutch police officers for estimating the risk for future care needs of juvenile non-offenders. The predictive validity of the Y-ACNAT-NO in terms of discrimination and calibration was sufficient to justify its use as an initial screening instrument when a decision is needed about referring a juvenile for further assessment of care needs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Classification tree for the validation sample. The grey shaded terminal nodes represent the eleven “risk groups” in which juveniles have similar scores on the variables that comprise the Y-ACNAT-NO and therefore the same risk for future care needs.n (%) = the number and percentage of juveniles that are classified in each tree node. Prop. care needs = proportion of juveniles with care needs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the Y-ACNAT-NO and YO-CNAT. Y-ACNAT-NO = Youth Actuarial Care Needs Assessment Tool for Non-Offenders; YO-CNAT = Youth Offender Care Needs Assessment Tool.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Harbert A, Tucker-Tatlow J. Review of child welfare risk assessments [http://theacademy.sdsu.edu/programs/SACHS/literature/SACHS_Risk_Assessme...]
    1. D’Andrade A, Austin MJ, Benton A. Risk and safety assessment in child welfare. J Evid Based Soc Work. 2008;5:31–56. doi: 10.1300/J394v05n01_03. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doueck HJ, English DJ, DePanfilis D, Moore GT. Decisionmaking in child protective services: a comparison of selected risk-assessment systems. Child Welfare. 1993;72:441–53. - PubMed
    1. Van der Put CE, Stams GJJM. Youth offender care needs assessment tool (YO-CNAT): an actuarial risk assessment tool for predicting problematic child-rearing situations in juvenile offenders on the basis of police records. Psychol Assess. 2013;25:1167–78. doi: 10.1037/a0033453. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bender K. Why do some maltreated youth become juvenile offenders? a call for further investigation and adaptation of youth services. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2010;32:466–73. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.10.022. - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
BioMed Central full text link BioMed Central Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp