Self-assessment of anatomy, sexual sensitivity, and function of the labia and vagina
- PMID:25683213
- DOI: 10.1002/ca.22503
Self-assessment of anatomy, sexual sensitivity, and function of the labia and vagina
Abstract
Patient perceptions of genital esthetics are motivating requests for plastic surgeries that could change sexual sensitivity. There is little information about the sensitivities of labial and introital sites. The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between sexual sensitivity and self-reported sizes of labial and introital sites. Sixty-two healthy, sexually active, adult women (mean age 37.9, range 21-60) with no history of genital or vaginal surgery gave written consent to participate in this study. A modified version of Self-Assessment of Genital Anatomy and Sexual Function (L-SAGASF-F) was used to assess labial and introital size. Site-specific sensation was rated on Likert scales of 1-5. Anatomical locations were compared for ratings. Of 62 responders, 84% (52) described their labia as "average-sized," 11% (7) described their labia minora and 13% (8) their labia majora as "large", and 3% (2) and 5% (3) as "small". Sexual pleasure ratings were "moderate" (median value: 3.0 for external genitalia and vaginal lumen) or "strong" (median value: 4.0 for the interior vagina). Significantly higher rankings related to the vaginal opening (P=0.007). Orgasm intensity for stimulation of the external genitalia progressively increased toward the vaginal opening, from 1.0 to 3.0 (P=0.001); vaginal ratings showed a similar progression, from 2.0 at the external luminal margin to 3.0 in the deep interior (P<0.0001). Orgasm effort scores were intermediate (median: 3.0), uniform throughout the external and internal areas (P=0.626). Ratings for labial and introital sensitivity, regardless of self-reported size, were very similar to those at other genital sites for sexual pleasure. Surgical excision of labial and introital structures could modify sexual sensation.
Keywords: genital anatomy; genital and sexual sensitivity; labia; sexual function; vagina.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
- Self-assessment of genital anatomy and sexual function within a Belgian, Dutch-speaking female population: a validation study.Bronselaer G, Callens N, De Sutter P, De Cuypere G, T'Sjoen G, Cools M, Hoebeke P.Bronselaer G, et al.J Sex Med. 2013 Dec;10(12):3006-18. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12326. Epub 2013 Sep 24.J Sex Med. 2013.PMID:24112472
- Self-assessment of genital anatomy, sexual sensitivity and function in women: implications for genitoplasty.Schober JM, Meyer-Bahlburg HF, Ransley PG.Schober JM, et al.BJU Int. 2004 Sep;94(4):589-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05006.x.BJU Int. 2004.PMID:15329118
- The self-assessment of genital anatomy, sexual function, and genital sensation (SAGASF-M) questionnaire in a Belgian Dutch-speaking male population: A validating study.Claeys W, Bronselaer G, Lumen N, Hoebeke P, Spinoit AF.Claeys W, et al.Andrology. 2023 Mar;11(3):489-500. doi: 10.1111/andr.13348. Epub 2022 Dec 9.Andrology. 2023.PMID:36426587
- Embryology and anatomy of the vulva: the female orgasm and women's sexual health.Puppo V.Puppo V.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Jan;154(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.08.009. Epub 2010 Sep 15.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011.PMID:20832160Review.
- Anatomy and Aesthetics of the Labia Minora: The Ideal Vulva?Clerico C, Lari A, Mojallal A, Boucher F.Clerico C, et al.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017 Jun;41(3):714-719. doi: 10.1007/s00266-017-0831-1. Epub 2017 Mar 10.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017.PMID:28314908Review.
Cited by
- Labiaplasty: motivation, techniques, and ethics.Özer M, Mortimore I, Jansma EP, Mullender MG.Özer M, et al.Nat Rev Urol. 2018 Mar;15(3):175-189. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2018.1. Epub 2018 Feb 6.Nat Rev Urol. 2018.PMID:29405204Review.
- Comment on "Early results of novel robotic surgery-assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer and transvaginal specimen extraction by using Da Vinci XI: initial clinical experience".Wu Z, Zhang Y, Li H, Huang J.Wu Z, et al.Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Mar 10;69(3):479-480. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20221597. eCollection 2023.Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023.PMID:36921202Free PMC article.No abstract available.
- Cosmetic labiaplasty on minors: a review of current trends and evidence.Kalampalikis A, Michala L.Kalampalikis A, et al.Int J Impot Res. 2023 May;35(3):192-195. doi: 10.1038/s41443-021-00480-1. Epub 2021 Oct 18.Int J Impot Res. 2023.PMID:34663925Free PMC article.Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources