Comparison of eleven commercially available rapid tests for detection of Bacillus anthracis, Francisella tularensis and Yersinia pestis
- PMID:25598285
- DOI: 10.1111/lam.12392
Comparison of eleven commercially available rapid tests for detection of Bacillus anthracis, Francisella tularensis and Yersinia pestis
Abstract
Yersinia pestis, Bacillus anthracis and Francisella tularensis cause serious zoonotic diseases and have the potential to cause high morbidity and mortality in humans. In case of natural outbreaks and deliberate or accidental release of these pathogens rapid detection of the bacteria is crucial for limitation of negative effects of the release. In the present study, we evaluated 11 commercially available rapid test kits for the detection of Y. pestis, B. anthracis and F. tularensis in terms of sensitivity, specificity and simplicity of the procedure. The results revealed that rapid and easy-to-perform lateral flow assays for detection of highly pathogenic bacteria have very limited sensitivity. In contrast, the immunofiltration assays showed high sensitivity but limited specificity and required a too complicated procedure to be applied in the field by nonlaboratory workers (e.g. First Responders like fire, police and emergency medical personnel). Each sample - whether tested negative or positive by the rapid tests - should be retested in a reference laboratory using validated methods.
Significance and impact of the study: Rapid detection of highly pathogenic bacteria causing anthrax, plague and tularemia is crucial for the limitation of negative effects of a potential release (natural, accidental or deliberate). In the study, commercially available rapid tests for detection of Bacillus anthracis, Yersinia pestis and Francisella tularensis were investigated in terms of sensitivity, specificity and ease-to-perform. The study showed problems which could be faced during testing and results interpretation. Conclusions from this study should be helpful not only in selection of the most appropriate test for particular group of First Responders but also in undertaking decisions in situation of a contamination suspicion which have high social and economical impacts.
Keywords: Bacillus anthracis; Francisella tularensis; Yersinia pestis; field assays; first responders; immunofiltration; lateral flow; rapid tests.
© 2015 The Society for Applied Microbiology.
Similar articles
- Rapid field detection assays for Bacillus anthracis, Brucella spp., Francisella tularensis and Yersinia pestis.Matero P, Hemmilä H, Tomaso H, Piiparinen H, Rantakokko-Jalava K, Nuotio L, Nikkari S.Matero P, et al.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Jan;17(1):34-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03178.x.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011.PMID:20132255
- Multiplex Detection of Three Select Agents Directly from Blood by Use of the GeneXpert System.Banada PP, Deshpande S, Banik S, Shah D, Koshy R, Patel B, Kwiatkowski R, Persing D, Alland D.Banada PP, et al.J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Apr 26;57(5):e00036-19. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00036-19. Print 2019 May.J Clin Microbiol. 2019.PMID:30842226Free PMC article.
- Simultaneous real-time PCR detection of Bacillus anthracis, Francisella tularensis and Yersinia pestis.Skottman T, Piiparinen H, Hyytiäinen H, Myllys V, Skurnik M, Nikkari S.Skottman T, et al.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Mar;26(3):207-11. doi: 10.1007/s10096-007-0262-z.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007.PMID:17294160
- Bacillus anthracis, Francisella tularensis and Yersinia pestis. The most important bacterial warfare agents - review.Pohanka M, Skládal P.Pohanka M, et al.Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2009;54(4):263-72. doi: 10.1007/s12223-009-0046-1. Epub 2009 Oct 14.Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2009.PMID:19826916Review.
- [Germs employed as biological weapons].Meyer CG, May J.Meyer CG, et al.Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2002 Sep;37(9):538-46. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33768.Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2002.PMID:12215940Review.German.No abstract available.
Cited by
- Enzyme-Linked Phage Receptor Binding Protein Assays (ELPRA) Enable Identification ofBacillus anthracis Colonies.Braun P, Rupprich N, Neif D, Grass G.Braun P, et al.Viruses. 2021 Jul 27;13(8):1462. doi: 10.3390/v13081462.Viruses. 2021.PMID:34452328Free PMC article.
- Evaluation of PCR Systems for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis.Ozanich RM, Colburn HA, Victry KD, Bartholomew RA, Arce JS, Heredia-Langner A, Jarman K, Kreuzer HW, Bruckner-Lea CJ.Ozanich RM, et al.Health Secur. 2017 Jan/Feb;15(1):70-80. doi: 10.1089/hs.2016.0043.Health Secur. 2017.PMID:28192050Free PMC article.
- Evaluation of Immunoassays and General Biological Indicator Tests for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis and Ricin.Bartholomew RA, Ozanich RM, Arce JS, Engelmann HE, Heredia-Langner A, Hofstad BA, Hutchison JR, Jarman K, Melville AM, Victry KD, Bruckner-Lea CJ.Bartholomew RA, et al.Health Secur. 2017 Jan/Feb;15(1):81-96. doi: 10.1089/hs.2016.0044.Health Secur. 2017.PMID:28192054Free PMC article.
- Rapid diagnostic tests for plague.Jullien S, Dissanayake HA, Chaplin M.Jullien S, et al.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 26;6(6):CD013459. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013459.pub2.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020.PMID:32597510Free PMC article.
- Detection of Bacillus anthracis in animal tissues using InBios active anthrax detect rapid test lateral flow immunoassay.Kolton CB, Marston CK, Stoddard RA, Cossaboom C, Salzer JS, Kozel TR, Gates-Hollingsworth MA, Cleveland CA, Thompson AT, Dalton MF, Yabsley MJ, Hoffmaster AR.Kolton CB, et al.Lett Appl Microbiol. 2019 Jun;68(6):480-484. doi: 10.1111/lam.13134. Epub 2019 Mar 28.Lett Appl Microbiol. 2019.PMID:30776143Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials