Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Silverchair Information Systems full text link Silverchair Information Systems Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2015 Jan 7;282(1798):20141531.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1531.

Eyespots deflect predator attack increasing fitness and promoting the evolution of phenotypic plasticity

Affiliations

Eyespots deflect predator attack increasing fitness and promoting the evolution of phenotypic plasticity

Kathleen L Prudic et al. Proc Biol Sci..

Abstract

Some eyespots are thought to deflect attack away from the vulnerable body, yet there is limited empirical evidence for this function and its adaptive advantage. Here, we demonstrate the conspicuous ventral hindwing eyespots found on Bicyclus anynana butterflies protect against invertebrate predators, specifically praying mantids. Wet season (WS) butterflies with larger, brighter eyespots were easier for mantids to detect, but more difficult to capture compared to dry season (DS) butterflies with small, dull eyespots. Mantids attacked the wing eyespots of WS butterflies more frequently resulting in greater butterfly survival and reproductive success. With a reciprocal eyespot transplant, we demonstrated the fitness benefits of eyespots were independent of butterfly behaviour. Regardless of whether the butterfly was WS or DS, large marginal eyespots pasted on the hindwings increased butterfly survival and successful oviposition during predation encounters. In previous studies, DS B. anynana experienced delayed detection by vertebrate predators, but both forms suffered low survival once detected. Our results suggest predator abundance, identity and phenology may all be important selective forces for B. anynana. Thus, reciprocal selection between invertebrate and vertebrate predators across seasons may contribute to the evolution of the B. anynana polyphenism.

Keywords: adaptive coloration; visual signalling; wing patterns.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mantid attack behaviours on dry season (DS) and wet season (WS) forms ofBicyclus anynana, and survival outcome for arena experiments. (a) The ventral surface of the two seasonal forms ofB. anynana. Note the differences in the ventral hindwing eyespot size. (b) Latency for the invertebrate predator,Tenodera sinensis, to orient on each form ofB. anynana. Means±95% CI presented. The DS form took longer for mantids to detect. (c) Percentage of butterfly escape once attacked by a praying mantid. The DS form was much less likely to escape once an attack was initiated. (d) Percentage of mantid first strike on various body parts ofB. anynana. The WS form was attacked more frequently on the hindwings than the DS form. (e) Percentage of damage observed per hindwing eyespot in the WS form only. Eyespots Cu1, Cu2 and Pc were the most damaged. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Longevity, fecundity and incurred wing damage for the DS and WS forms ofB. anynana in microcosm experiments in the presence or the absence of mantids. (a) Average longevity measured in days. Means ± 95% CI are reported. DS forms survived longer in the absence of mantids while WS forms survived longer in the presence of mantids. (b) Average number of eggs laid. Means ± 95% CI are reported. WS form females laid more eggs, and mantids negatively impacted oviposition in both forms. (c) Percentage hindwing eyespot damage. WS forms experienced greater amounts of damage on their ventral hindwing eyespots in the presence of a mantid. Asterisks indicate statistical significance between the treatments.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Longevity, fecundity and incurred wing damage for the DS and WS forms ofB. anynana with transplanted ventral hindwing eyespots in microcosm experiments with mantids. (a) Average longevity measured in days. Means ± 95% CI are reported. Butterflies with WS eyespots survived much longer regardless of butterfly form. (b) Average number of eggs laid. Means ± 95% CI are reported. Butterflies with WS eyespots laid more eggs regardless of butterfly form. (c) Percentage hindwing eyespot damage. Butterflies with WS eyespots, regardless of butterfly form, exhibited greater amounts of damage on their ventral hindwing eyespots. Asterisks indicate statistical significance between the treatments.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Stevens M. 2005. The role of eyespots as anti-predator mechanisms, principally demonstrated in the Lepidoptera. Biol. Rev. 80, 573–588. ( 10.1017/S1464793105006810) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kodandaramaiah U. 2011. The evolutionary significance of butterfly eyespots. Behav. Ecol. 22, 1264–1271. ( 10.1093/beheco/arr123) - DOI
    1. Vallin A, Jakobsson S, Lind J, Wiklund C. 2005. Prey survival by predator intimidation: an experimental study of peacock butterfly defence against blue tits. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 1203–1207. ( 10.1098/rspb.2004.3034) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stevens M, Hopkins E, Hinde W, Adcock A, Connolly Y, Troscianko T, Cuthill IC. 2007. Field experiments on the effectiveness of ‘eyespots’ as predator deterrents. Anim. Behav. 74, 1215–1227. ( 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.01.031) - DOI
    1. Kodandaramaiah U, Vallin A, Wiklund C. 2009. Fixed eyespot display in butterfly thwarts attacking birds. Anim. Behav. 77, 1415–1419. ( 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.018) - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Silverchair Information Systems full text link Silverchair Information Systems Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp