Environmental impacts of the use of ecosystem services: case study of birdwatching
- PMID:24993794
- PMCID: PMC4129236
- DOI: 10.1007/s00267-014-0317-8
Environmental impacts of the use of ecosystem services: case study of birdwatching
Abstract
The main reason for promoting the concept of ecosystem services lies in its potential to contribute to environmental conservation. Highlighting the benefits derived from ecosystems fosters an understanding of humans' dependence on nature, as users of ecosystem services. However, the act of using ecosystem services may not be environmentally neutral. As with the use of products and services generated within an economy, the use of ecosystem services may lead to unintended environmental consequences throughout the 'ecosystem services supply chain.' This article puts forward a framework for analyzing environmental impacts related to the use of ecosystem services, indicating five categories of impact: (1) direct impacts (directly limiting the service's future availability); and four categories of indirect impacts, i.e., on broader ecosystem structures and processes, which can ultimately also affect the initial service: (2) impacts related to managing ecosystems to maximize the delivery of selected services (affecting ecosystems' capacity to provide other services); (3) impacts associated with accessing ecosystems to use their services (affecting other ecosystem components); (4) additional consumption of products, infrastructure or services required to use a selected ecosystem service, and their life-cycle environmental impacts; and (5) broader impacts on the society as a whole (environmental awareness of ecosystem service users and other stakeholders). To test the usefulness of this framework, the article uses the case study of birdwatching, which demonstrates all of the above categories of impacts. The article justifies the need for a broader consideration of environmental impacts related to the use of ecosystem services.
Figures
Similar articles
- Ecosystem services accounts: Valuing the actual flow of nature-based recreation from ecosystems to people.Vallecillo S, La Notte A, Zulian G, Ferrini S, Maes J.Vallecillo S, et al.Ecol Modell. 2019 Jan 24;392:196-211. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.09.023.Ecol Modell. 2019.PMID:31007344Free PMC article.
- Ecosystem services in urban water investment.Kandulu JM, Connor JD, MacDonald DH.Kandulu JM, et al.J Environ Manage. 2014 Dec 1;145:43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.024. Epub 2014 Jul 1.J Environ Manage. 2014.PMID:24992048
- Perception, demand and user contribution to ecosystem services in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt.Casado-Arzuaga I, Madariaga I, Onaindia M.Casado-Arzuaga I, et al.J Environ Manage. 2013 Nov 15;129:33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.059. Epub 2013 Jun 20.J Environ Manage. 2013.PMID:23792888
- Review of the ecosystem service implications of mangrove encroachment into salt marshes.Kelleway JJ, Cavanaugh K, Rogers K, Feller IC, Ens E, Doughty C, Saintilan N.Kelleway JJ, et al.Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Oct;23(10):3967-3983. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13727. Epub 2017 May 20.Glob Chang Biol. 2017.PMID:28544444Review.
- Recreational impacts on the fauna of Australian coastal marine ecosystems.Hardiman N, Burgin S.Hardiman N, et al.J Environ Manage. 2010 Nov;91(11):2096-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.012. Epub 2010 Jul 7.J Environ Manage. 2010.PMID:20615603Review.
Cited by
- Consumptive and Non-Consumptive Uses of Water Beetles (Aquatic coleopterans) in Sub-Saharan Traditional Rituals.Mnisi LN, Zondi N, Pikirayi I.Mnisi LN, et al.Insects. 2023 Sep 29;14(10):795. doi: 10.3390/insects14100795.Insects. 2023.PMID:37887807Free PMC article.
- Characterization of Birdwatching Demand Using a Logit Approach: Comparative Analysis of Source Markets (National vs Foreign).Sánchez-Rivero M, Sánchez-Martín JM, Rodríguez Rangel MC.Sánchez-Rivero M, et al.Animals (Basel). 2020 Jun 2;10(6):965. doi: 10.3390/ani10060965.Animals (Basel). 2020.PMID:32498379Free PMC article.
- State ownership of forests from different angles: policy, economics, and law.Birben Ü.Birben Ü.Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Jul 20;191(8):502. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7641-7.Environ Monit Assess. 2019.PMID:31327078
- Economic valuation of natural promenades in Iran using zonal travel costs method (Case study area: Gahar Lake in Lorestan Province in western Iran).Kheyri E, Morovati M, Neshat A, Siahati G.Kheyri E, et al.PLoS One. 2020 Nov 4;15(11):e0241396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241396. eCollection 2020.PLoS One. 2020.PMID:33147600Free PMC article.
- Ecosystem Services in the Nemunas Delta: Differences in Perceptions of Farmers, Birdwatchers and Scientists.Morkūnė R, Gasiūnaitė ZR, Žukovskis J, Marcinkevičiūtė L, Razinkovas-Baziukas A.Morkūnė R, et al.Environ Manage. 2022 Apr;69(4):801-814. doi: 10.1007/s00267-021-01550-2. Epub 2021 Oct 29.Environ Manage. 2022.PMID:34716466Free PMC article.
References
- Baumgärtner S, Dyckhoff H, Faber M, et al. The concept of joint production and ecological economics. Ecol Econ. 2001;36:365–372. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00260-3. - DOI
- Biggs D, Turpie J, Fabricius C, Spenceley A. The value of avitourism for conservation and job creation: an analysis from South Africa. Conserv Soc. 2011;9:80–90. doi: 10.4103/0972-4923.79198. - DOI
- Bircham P. A history of ornithology. London: Collins; 2007.
- Blackwell BF, Huszar E, Linz GM, Dolbeer RA. Lethal control of red-winged blackbirds to manage damage to sunflower: an economic evaluation. J Wildl Manag. 2003;67:818–828. doi: 10.2307/3802689. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials