Protective buttressing of the hominin face
- PMID:24909544
- DOI: 10.1111/brv.12112
Protective buttressing of the hominin face
Abstract
When humans fight hand-to-hand the face is usually the primary target and the bones that suffer the highest rates of fracture are the parts of the skull that exhibit the greatest increase in robusticity during the evolution of basal hominins. These bones are also the most sexually dimorphic parts of the skull in both australopiths and humans. In this review, we suggest that many of the facial features that characterize early hominins evolved to protect the face from injury during fighting with fists. Specifically, the trend towards a more orthognathic face; the bunodont form and expansion of the postcanine teeth; the increased robusticity of the orbit; the increased robusticity of the masticatory system, including the mandibular corpus and condyle, zygoma, and anterior pillars of the maxilla; and the enlarged jaw adductor musculature are traits that may represent protective buttressing of the face. If the protective buttressing hypothesis is correct, the primary differences in the face of robust versus gracile australopiths may be more a function of differences in mating system than differences in diet as is generally assumed. In this scenario, the evolution of reduced facial robusticity in Homo is associated with the evolution of reduced strength of the upper body and, therefore, with reduced striking power. The protective buttressing hypothesis provides a functional explanation for the puzzling observation that although humans do not fight by biting our species exhibits pronounced sexual dimorphism in the strength and power of the jaw and neck musculature. The protective buttressing hypothesis is also consistent with observations that modern humans can accurately assess a male's strength and fighting ability from facial shape and voice quality.
Keywords: Australopithecus; Homo; Paranthropus; fighting; male facial shape; male-male competition; masculine voices; sexual dimorphism; visual assessment of strength.
© 2014 The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2014 Cambridge Philosophical Society.
Similar articles
- Mechanical compensation in the evolution of the early hominin feeding apparatus.Ledogar JA, Senck S, Villmoare BA, Smith AL, Weber GW, Richmond BG, Dechow PC, Ross CF, Grosse IR, Wright BW, Wang Q, Byron C, Benazzi S, Carlson KJ, Carlson KB, Pryor McIntosh LC, van Casteren A, Strait DS.Ledogar JA, et al.Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Jun 8;289(1976):20220711. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0711. Epub 2022 Jun 15.Proc Biol Sci. 2022.PMID:35703052Free PMC article.
- In vitro strain in human metacarpal bones during striking: testing the pugilism hypothesis of hominin hand evolution.Horns J, Jung R, Carrier DR.Horns J, et al.J Exp Biol. 2015 Oct;218(Pt 20):3215-21. doi: 10.1242/jeb.125831.J Exp Biol. 2015.PMID:26491193
- Craniofacial morphology of Homo floresiensis: description, taxonomic affinities, and evolutionary implication.Kaifu Y, Baba H, Sutikna T, Morwood MJ, Kubo D, Saptomo EW, Jatmiko, Awe RD, Djubiantono T.Kaifu Y, et al.J Hum Evol. 2011 Dec;61(6):644-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Oct 28.J Hum Evol. 2011.PMID:22036083
- Evolution of hominin cranial ontogeny.Zollikofer CP.Zollikofer CP.Prog Brain Res. 2012;195:273-92. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53860-4.00013-1.Prog Brain Res. 2012.PMID:22230632Review.
- The diets of early hominins.Ungar PS, Sponheimer M.Ungar PS, et al.Science. 2011 Oct 14;334(6053):190-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1207701.Science. 2011.PMID:21998380Review.
Cited by
- Sexual Dimorphism: The Interrelation of Shape and Color.Pokorný Š, Pavlovič O, Kleisner K.Pokorný Š, et al.Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Aug;53(8):3255-3265. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02918-1. Epub 2024 Jun 28.Arch Sex Behav. 2024.PMID:38944665Free PMC article.
- Human third-party observers accurately track fighting skill and vigour along their unique paths to victory.Caton NR, Dixson BJW.Caton NR, et al.Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 1;12(1):14841. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19044-4.Sci Rep. 2022.PMID:36050502Free PMC article.
- Does Adult Sex Ratio Predict Regional Variation in Facial Dominance Perceptions? Evidence From an Analysis of U.S. States.Torrance JS, Kandrik M, Lee AJ, DeBruine LM, Jones BC.Torrance JS, et al.Evol Psychol. 2018 Apr-Jun;16(2):1474704918776748. doi: 10.1177/1474704918776748.Evol Psychol. 2018.PMID:29860865Free PMC article.
- Impact Protection Potential of Mammalian Hair: Testing the Pugilism Hypothesis for the Evolution of Human Facial Hair.Beseris EA, Naleway SE, Carrier DR.Beseris EA, et al.Integr Org Biol. 2020 Apr 15;2(1):obaa005. doi: 10.1093/iob/obaa005. eCollection 2020.Integr Org Biol. 2020.PMID:33791549Free PMC article.
- A Novel Cephalometric Approach Aiming to Quantify a Normal Range of Bony Chin Protrusion.Chu J, Basyuni S, Moore S, Ferro A, Chang C, Patel K, Jeremiah H, Brassett C, Santhanam V.Chu J, et al.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Mar;22(1):226-231. doi: 10.1007/s12663-022-01784-5. Epub 2022 Dec 13.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023.PMID:36703669Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources