Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science
Full text links

Actions

Share

Review
.2014 Jun;145(6):1407-1418.
doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2104.

Early management of severe sepsis: concepts and controversies

Affiliations
Review

Early management of severe sepsis: concepts and controversies

Paul E Marik. Chest.2014 Jun.

Abstract

Sepsis is among the most common reasons for admission to ICUs throughout the world, and it is believed to be the third most common cause of death in the United States. The pathogenetic mechanism and physiologic changes associated with sepsis are exceedingly complex, but our understanding is evolving rapidly. The major pathophysiologic changes in patients with septic shock include vasoplegic shock (distributive shock), myocardial depression, altered microvascular flow, and a diffuse endothelial injury. These pathophysiologic changes play a central role in the management of sepsis. The early management of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock centers on the administration of antibiotics, IV fluids, and vasoactive agents, followed by source control. However, the specific approach to the resuscitation of patients with septic shock remains highly controversial. This review provides a practical and physiologic-based approach to the early management of sepsis and explores the controversies surrounding the management of this complex condition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Systemic vascular resistance should be banned.
    Rodgers M.Rodgers M.Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4):e143. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1408.Chest. 2014.PMID:25288008No abstract available.
  • Response.
    Marik PE.Marik PE.Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4):e143-4. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1460.Chest. 2014.PMID:25288009No abstract available.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Related information

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp