Feeling well and talking about sex: psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning after cancer
- PMID:24673768
- PMCID: PMC3986691
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-228
Feeling well and talking about sex: psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning after cancer
Abstract
Background: Changes to sexual wellbeing are acknowledged to be a long-term negative consequence of cancer and cancer treatment. These changes can have a negative effect on psychological well-being, quality of life and couple relationships. Whilst previous conclusions are based on univariate analysis, multivariate research can facilitate examination of the complex interaction between sexual function and psycho-social variables such as psychological wellbeing, quality of life, and relationship satisfaction and communication in the context of cancer, the aim of the present study.
Method: Six hundred and fifty seven people with cancer (535 women, 122 men) and 148 partners (87 women, 61 men), across a range of sexual and non-sexual cancers, completed a survey consisting of standardized measures of sexual functioning, depression and anxiety, quality of life, relationship satisfaction, dyadic sexual communication, and self-silencing, as well as ratings of the importance of sex to life and relationships.
Results: Men and women participants, reported reductions in sexual functioning after cancer across cancer type, for both people with cancer and partners. Multiple regression analysis examined psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning. Physical quality of life was a predictor for men and women with cancer, and for male partners. Dyadic sexual communication was a predictor for women with cancer, and for men and women partners. Mental quality of life and depression were also predictors for women with cancer, and the lower self-sacrifice subscale of self-silencing a predictor for men with cancer.
Conclusion: These results suggest that information and supportive interventions developed to alleviate sexual difficulties and facilitate sexual renegotiation should be offered to men and women with both sexual and non-sexual cancers, rather than primarily focused on individuals with sexual and reproductive cancers, as is the case currently. It is also important to include partners in supportive interventions. Interventions aimed at improving sexual functioning should include elements aimed at improving physical quality of life and sexual communication, with a focus on psychological wellbeing also being important for women with cancer.
Similar articles
- Perceived causes and consequences of sexual changes after cancer for women and men: a mixed method study.Ussher JM, Perz J, Gilbert E; Australian Cancer and Sexuality Study Team.Ussher JM, et al.BMC Cancer. 2015 Apr 11;15:268. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1243-8.BMC Cancer. 2015.PMID:25885443Free PMC article.
- Partners Experience Consequences, Too: A Comparison of the Sexual, Relational, and Psychological Adjustment of Women with Sexual Interest/Arousal Disorder and Their Partners to Control Couples.Rosen NO, Dubé JP, Corsini-Munt S, Muise A.Rosen NO, et al.J Sex Med. 2019 Jan;16(1):83-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Dec 1.J Sex Med. 2019.PMID:30509505
- Sexual communication, dyadic adjustment, and psychosexual well-being in premenopausal women with self-reported dyspareunia and their partners: a controlled study.Pazmany E, Bergeron S, Verhaeghe J, Van Oudenhove L, Enzlin P.Pazmany E, et al.J Sex Med. 2014 Jul;11(7):1786-97. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12518. Epub 2014 Apr 1.J Sex Med. 2014.PMID:24690206
- Psychological and Interpersonal Dimensions of Sexual Function and Dysfunction.Brotto L, Atallah S, Johnson-Agbakwu C, Rosenbaum T, Abdo C, Byers ES, Graham C, Nobre P, Wylie K.Brotto L, et al.J Sex Med. 2016 Apr;13(4):538-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.019. Epub 2016 Mar 25.J Sex Med. 2016.PMID:27045257Review.
- Effects of couple-based dyadic interventions on breast cancer patients and their intimate partners: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Li M, Zhang L, Li N, Luo X, Chen J, Zhang Y, Xiong C, Zhao M, Guo Z, Yan J.Li M, et al.J Adv Nurs. 2023 Sep;79(9):3192-3213. doi: 10.1111/jan.15639. Epub 2023 Mar 14.J Adv Nurs. 2023.PMID:36918983Review.
Cited by
- Importance of sexuality in colorectal cancer: predictors, changes, and response to an intimacy enhancement intervention.Reese JB, Haythornthwaite JA.Reese JB, et al.Support Care Cancer. 2016 Oct;24(10):4309-17. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3265-4. Epub 2016 May 25.Support Care Cancer. 2016.PMID:27220648
- The Self-Efficacy to Communicate about Sex and Intimacy (SECSI) scale: psychometric assessment in women treated for cancer.Arthur EK, Wills CE, Browning K, Overcash J, Menon U.Arthur EK, et al.Support Care Cancer. 2020 Mar;28(3):1449-1457. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04963-2. Epub 2019 Jul 4.Support Care Cancer. 2020.PMID:31273504
- Couples' sexual health after gynaecological cancer diagnosis - an unexplored area for further research.Nowosielski K, Pałka A.Nowosielski K, et al.Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2023;27(1):47-56. doi: 10.5114/wo.2023.127308. Epub 2023 Apr 27.Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2023.PMID:37266338Free PMC article.
- Healthcare Professionals' Attitudes and Practice of Sexual Health Care: Preliminary Study for Developing Training Program.Ahn SH, Kim JH.Ahn SH, et al.Front Public Health. 2020 Oct 16;8:559851. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.559851. eCollection 2020.Front Public Health. 2020.PMID:33178658Free PMC article.
- Satisfaction with fertility- and sexuality-related information in young women with breast cancer--ELIPPSE40 cohort.Ben Charif A, Bouhnik AD, Rey D, Provansal M, Courbiere B, Spire B, Mancini J.Ben Charif A, et al.BMC Cancer. 2015 Aug 5;15:572. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1542-0.BMC Cancer. 2015.PMID:26239242Free PMC article.
References
- World Health Organisation. The world health organisation quality of life assessment (whoqol) position paper. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1403–1409. - PubMed
- Anderson BL, Golden-Kreutz DM, Baider L, Cooper CL, De-Nour AK. Cancer and the Family. England: John Wiley and Sons; 2000. Sexual self-concept for the women with cancer.
- De Groot JM, Mah K, Fyles A, Winton S, Greenwood S, De Petrillo AD, Devins S. The psychosocial impact of cervical cancer among affected women and their partners. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15:918–925. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources