Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

BioMed Central full text link BioMed Central Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2014 Mar 7;11(1):23.
doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-11-23.

Insect immunity: oral exposure to a bacterial pathogen elicits free radical response and protects from a recurring infection

Affiliations

Insect immunity: oral exposure to a bacterial pathogen elicits free radical response and protects from a recurring infection

Lauri Mikonranta et al. Front Zool..

Abstract

Background: Previous exposure to a pathogen can help organisms cope with recurring infection. This is widely recognised in vertebrates, but increasing occasions are also being reported in invertebrates where this phenomenon is referred to as immune priming. However, the mechanisms that allow acquired pathogen resistance in insects remain largely unknown.

Results: We studied the priming of bacterial resistance in the larvae of the tiger moth, Parasemia plantaginis using two gram-negative bacteria, a pathogenic Serratia marcescens and a non-pathogenic control, Escherichia coli. A sublethal oral dose of S. marcescens provided the larvae with effective protection against an otherwise lethal septic infection with the same pathogen five days later. At the same time, we assessed three anti-bacterial defence mechanisms from the larvae that had been primarily exposed to the bacteria via contaminated host plant. Results showed that S. marcescens had induced a higher amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the larval haemolymph, possibly protecting the host from the recurring infection.

Conclusions: Our study supports the growing evidence of immune priming in insects. It shows that activation of the protective mechanism requires a specific induction, rather than a sheer exposure to any gram-negative bacteria. The findings indicate that systemic pathogen recognition happens via the gut, and suggest that persistent loitering of immune elicitors or anti-microbial molecules are a possible mechanism for the observed prophylaxis. The self-harming effects of ROS molecules are well known, which indicates a potential cost of increased resistance. Together these findings could have important implications on the ecological and epidemiological processes affecting insect and pathogen populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Larval survival after septic injury. The four survival curves present different priming-injection groups, where the first term is bacteria used in the priming, and second term bacteria used in septic infection 120 h later. Ec stands for the control bacterium,E. coli, and Sm forS. marcescens. Treatments from the least to the most virulent combination: Ec-Ec < Sm-Ec < Sm-Sm < Ec-Sm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The immune assays from differently primed larvae 120 h after the initial exposure. Ec stands for the control bacterium,E. coli, and Sm forS. marcescens. Asterisk (*) indicates a significant (<0.05) difference between the oral priming treatments. The amount of ROS in the haemolymph(a), the lytic activity(b) and the PO activity(c).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kurtz J. Specific memory within innate immune systems. Trends Immunol. 2005;26:186–192. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2005.02.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moret Y, Siva-Jothy MT. Adaptive innate immunity? Responsive-mode prophylaxis in the mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor. Proc R Soc B. 2003;270:2475–2480. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2511. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Little TJ, Kraaijeveld AR. Ecological and evolutionary implications of immunological priming in invertebrates. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004;19:58–60. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2003.11.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sadd BM, Schmid-Hempel P. Insect immunity shows specificity in protection upon secondary pathogen exposure. Curr Biol. 2006;16:1206–1210. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.04.047. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roth O, Sadd BM, Schmid-Hempel P, Kurtz J. Strain-specific priming of resistance in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Proc R Soc B. 2009;276:145–151. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1157. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
BioMed Central full text link BioMed Central Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp