Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

Review
.2014 Feb-Mar:48-49:60-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2014.01.020. Epub 2014 Feb 1.

International consensus criteria for the diagnosis of Raynaud's phenomenon

Affiliations
Review

International consensus criteria for the diagnosis of Raynaud's phenomenon

Emanual Maverakis et al. J Autoimmun.2014 Feb-Mar.

Abstract

Vasoconstriction accompanied by changes in skin color is a normal physiologic response to cold. The distinction between this normal physiology and Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) has yet to be well characterized. In anticipation of the 9th International Congress on Autoimmunity, a panel of 12 RP experts from 9 different institutes and four different countries were assembled for a Delphi exercise to establish new diagnostic criteria for RP. Relevant investigators with highly cited manuscripts in Raynaud's-related research were identified using the Web of Science and invited to participate. Surveys at each stage were administered to participants via the on-line SurveyMonkey software tool. The participants evaluated the level of appropriateness of statements using a scale of 1 (extremely inappropriate) through 9 (extremely appropriate). In the second stage, panel participants were asked to rank rewritten items from the first round that were scored as "uncertain" for the diagnosis of RP, items with significant disagreement (Disagreement Index > 1), and new items suggested by the panel. Results were analyzed using the Interpercentile Range Adjusted for Symmetry (IPRAS) method. A 3-Step Approach to diagnose RP was then developed using items the panelists "agreed" were "appropriate" diagnostic criteria. In the final stage, the panel was presented with the newly developed diagnostic criteria and asked to rate them against previous models. Following the first two iterations of the Delphi exercise, the panel of 12 experts agreed that 36 of the items were "appropriate", 12 items had "uncertain" appropriateness, and 13 items were "inappropriate" to use in the diagnostic criteria of RP. Using an expert committee, we developed a 3-Step Approach for the diagnosis of RP and 5 additional criteria for the diagnosis of primary RP. The committee came to an agreement that the proposed criteria were "appropriate and accurate" for use by physicians to diagnose patients with RP.

Keywords: Diagnostic criteria; Primary Raynaud's; Raynaud's phenomenon; Secondary Raynaud's.

Published by Elsevier Ltd.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest disclosures: None Reported

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Expert panel development process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Three-step outline for newly proposed diagnostic method.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Anderson ME, et al. Computerized nailfold video capillaroscopy--a new tool for assessment of Raynaud's phenomenon. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(5):841–848. - PubMed
    1. Block JA, Sequeira W. Raynaud's phenomenon. Lancet. 2001;357(9273):2042–2048. - PubMed
    1. Goundry B, et al. Diagnosis and management of Raynaud's phenomenon. BMJ. 2012;344:e289. - PubMed
    1. Wigley FM. Clinical practice. Raynaud's Phenomenon. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(13):1001–1008. - PubMed
    1. Herrick AL. Pathogenesis of Raynaud's phenomenon. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005;44(5):587–596. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Related information

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp