Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Atypon full text link Atypon Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2014 Jan 15:19:23141.
doi: 10.3402/meo.v19.23141. eCollection 2014.

Development of a medical academic degree system in China

Affiliations

Development of a medical academic degree system in China

Lijuan Wu et al. Med Educ Online..

Abstract

Context: The Chinese government launched a comprehensive healthcare reform to tackle challenges to health equities. Medical education will become the key for successful healthcare reform.

Purpose: We describe the current status of the Chinese medical degree system and its evolution over the last 80 years.

Content: Progress has been uneven, historically punctuated most dramatically by the Cultural Revolution. There is a great regional disparity. Doctors with limited tertiary education may be licensed to practice, whereas medical graduates with advanced doctorates may have limited clinical skills. There are undefined relationships between competing tertiary training streams, the academic professional degree, and the clinical residency training programme (RTP). The perceived quality of training in both streams varies widely across China. As the degrees of master or doctor of academic medicine is seen as instrumental in career advancement, including employability in urban hospitals, attainment of this degree is sought after, yet is often unrelated to a role in health care, or is seen as superior to clinical experience. Meanwhile, the practical experience gained in some prestigious academic institutions is deprecated by the RTP and must be repeated before accreditation for clinical practice. This complexity is confusing both for students seeking the most appropriate training, and also for clinics, hospitals and universities seeking to recruit the most appropriate applicants.

Conclusion: The future education reforms might include: 1) a domestic system of 'credits' that gives weight to quality clinical experience vs. academic publications in career advancement, enhanced harmonisation between the competing streams of the professional degree and the RTP, and promotion of mobility of staff between areas of excellence and areas of need; 2) International - a mutual professional and academic recognition between China and other countries by reference to the Bologna Accord, setting up a system of easily comparable and well-understood medical degrees.

Keywords: Bologna Accords; China; medical degree; medical education; medical licensing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Multipath to acquire multilevel of medical degrees.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Chen JD, Dai D, Pu M, Hou WX, Feng QB. The trend of the GINI coefficient of China. Brooks World Poverty Institute. 2010 Available from:http://www.bwpi.manchester.ac.uk/resources/Working-Papers/bwpi-wp-10910.pdf [cited 11 August 2011]
    1. Tang SL, Meng QY, Chen L, Bekedam H, Evans T, Whitehead M. Tackling the challenges to health equity in China. Lancet. 2008;372:1493–501. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ling RE, Liu F, Lu QX, Wang W. Emerging issues in public health: a perspective on China's healthcare system. Public Health. 2010;125:9–14. - PubMed
    1. Xu D, Sun BZ, Wang XH, Ke Y. Reformation of medical education in China. Lancet. 2010;375:1052–4. - PubMed
    1. Anand S, Fan VY, Zhang JH, Zhang LL, Ke Y, Dong Z, et al. China's human resources for health: quantity, quality, and distribution. Lancet. 2008;372:1774–81. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Atypon full text link Atypon Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp