Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Review
.2013 Dec;12(12):3532-42.
doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.031310. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

Proteolytic post-translational modification of proteins: proteomic tools and methodology

Affiliations
Review

Proteolytic post-translational modification of proteins: proteomic tools and methodology

Lindsay D Rogers et al. Mol Cell Proteomics.2013 Dec.

Abstract

Proteolytic processing is a ubiquitous and irreversible post-translational modification involving limited and highly specific hydrolysis of peptide and isopeptide bonds of a protein by a protease. Cleavage generates shorter protein chains displaying neo-N and -C termini, often with new or modified biological activities. Within the past decade, degradomics and terminomics have emerged as significant proteomics subfields dedicated to characterizing proteolysis products as well as natural protein N and C termini. Here we provide an overview of contemporary proteomics-based methods, including specific quantitation, data analysis, and curation considerations, and highlight exciting new and emerging applications within these fields enabling in vivo analysis of proteolytic events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Representation of select N- and C-terminal peptide enrichment strategies. COFRADIC is shown as a combination of two variations of the method employing either 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS) treatment for enrichment of N-terminal peptides or N-Hydroxysuccinimidyl-butyrate treatment for separation of N- and C-terminal peptides. Refer to the main text for a description of each method.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Quantitation and terminomics data.A, flow diagram representing quantitation of terminal peptides between a control and protease-treated condition.B, schematic showing quantifiable N-terminal peptides following stable-isotope labeling methods targeting primary amines. X represents any amino acid except lysine; red diamonds represent an amine modification such as acetylation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Barret A. J., Rawlings N. D., Woessner J. F. (1998) Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes, Academic Press, London
    1. Puente X. S., Sanchez L. M., Overall C. M., Lopez-Otin C. (2003) Human and mouse proteases: a comparative genomic approach. Nature Rev. Genet. 4, 544–558 - PubMed
    1. Turk B. (2006) Targeting proteases: successes, failures and future prospects. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 5, 785–799 - PubMed
    1. Lopez-Otin C., Overall C. M. (2002) Protease degradomics: a new challenge for proteomics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 3, 509–519 - PubMed
    1. Matthews D. J., Wells J. A. (1993) Substrate phage: selection of protease substrates by monovalent phage display. Science 260, 1113–1117 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp