Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness
- PMID:23569234
- PMCID: PMC3637716
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1219361110
Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness
Abstract
Compelling evidence from many animal taxa indicates that male genitalia are often under postcopulatory sexual selection for characteristics that increase a male's relative fertilization success. There could, however, also be direct precopulatory female mate choice based on male genital traits. Before clothing, the nonretractable human penis would have been conspicuous to potential mates. This observation has generated suggestions that human penis size partly evolved because of female choice. Here we show, based upon female assessment of digitally projected life-size, computer-generated images, that penis size interacts with body shape and height to determine male sexual attractiveness. Positive linear selection was detected for penis size, but the marginal increase in attractiveness eventually declined with greater penis size (i.e., quadratic selection). Penis size had a stronger effect on attractiveness in taller men than in shorter men. There was a similar increase in the positive effect of penis size on attractiveness with a more masculine body shape (i.e., greater shoulder-to-hip ratio). Surprisingly, larger penis size and greater height had almost equivalent positive effects on male attractiveness. Our results support the hypothesis that female mate choice could have driven the evolution of larger penises in humans. More broadly, our results show that precopulatory sexual selection can play a role in the evolution of genital traits.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures



Comment in
- Words of wisdom. Re: Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness.van Driel MF.van Driel MF.Eur Urol. 2014 Apr;65(4):845. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.031.Eur Urol. 2014.PMID:24559902No abstract available.
Similar articles
- Words of wisdom. Re: Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness.van Driel MF.van Driel MF.Eur Urol. 2014 Apr;65(4):845. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.031.Eur Urol. 2014.PMID:24559902No abstract available.
- Direct selection on male attractiveness and female preference fails to produce a response.Hall M, Lindholm AK, Brooks R.Hall M, et al.BMC Evol Biol. 2004 Jan 14;4:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-4-1.BMC Evol Biol. 2004.PMID:14720309Free PMC article.
- Experimental evidence for the evolution of the Mammalian baculum by sexual selection.Simmons LW, Firman RC.Simmons LW, et al.Evolution. 2014 Jan;68(1):276-83. doi: 10.1111/evo.12229. Epub 2013 Aug 29.Evolution. 2014.PMID:24372607
- The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.Bonduriansky R.Bonduriansky R.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001 Aug;76(3):305-39. doi: 10.1017/s1464793101005693.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001.PMID:11569787Review.
- Sexual selection for moral virtues.Miller GF.Miller GF.Q Rev Biol. 2007 Jun;82(2):97-125. doi: 10.1086/517857.Q Rev Biol. 2007.PMID:17583267Review.
Cited by
- History and future perspectives of male aesthetic genital surgery.Zaccaro C, Subirà D, López-Diez I, Manfredi C, Ascensios-Vargas JP, Moncada-Iribarren I.Zaccaro C, et al.Int J Impot Res. 2022 May;34(4):327-331. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00580-6. Epub 2022 May 10.Int J Impot Res. 2022.PMID:35538312Review.
- A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology.Clarkson TR, Sidari MJ, Sains R, Alexander M, Harrison M, Mefodeva V, Pearson S, Lee AJ, Dixson BJW.Clarkson TR, et al.R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Jan 15;7(1):191209. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191209. eCollection 2020 Jan.R Soc Open Sci. 2020.PMID:32218951Free PMC article.
- Women's Preferences for Penis Size: A New Research Method Using Selection among 3D Models.Prause N, Park J, Leung S, Miller G.Prause N, et al.PLoS One. 2015 Sep 2;10(9):e0133079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133079. eCollection 2015.PLoS One. 2015.PMID:26332467Free PMC article.
- Smaller prize, bigger size? Exploring the impact of money on men's self-reported markers of masculinity.Christensen JD, Otterbring T, Lagerkvist CJ.Christensen JD, et al.Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 1;14:1105423. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1105423. eCollection 2023.Front Psychol. 2023.PMID:36818136Free PMC article.
- The effect of penis size on partner sexual satisfaction: a literature review.Loos S, De Wil P, Delcarte L, Serefoglu EC, Van Renterghem K, Ward S.Loos S, et al.Int J Impot Res. 2023 Sep;35(6):519-522. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00636-7. Epub 2022 Oct 28.Int J Impot Res. 2023.PMID:36307732Review.
References
- Arnqvist G. Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature. 1998;393(6687):784–786.
- Simmons LW. Sperm Competition and Its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ Press; 2001.
- Eberhard WG. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ Press; 1996.
- Bertin A, Fairbairn DJ. One tool, many uses: Precopulatory sexual selection on genital morphology in Aquarius remigis. J Evol Biol. 2005;18(4):949–961. - PubMed
- Grieshop K, Polak M. The precopulatory function of male genital spines in Drosophila ananassae[Doleschall] (Diptera: Drosophilidae) revealed by laser surgery. Evolution. 2012;66(8):2637–2645. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources