Public accessibility of biomedical articles from PubMed Central reduces journal readership--retrospective cohort analysis
- PMID:23554455
- PMCID: PMC3688741
- DOI: 10.1096/fj.13-229922
Public accessibility of biomedical articles from PubMed Central reduces journal readership--retrospective cohort analysis
Abstract
Does PubMed Central--a government-run digital archive of biomedical articles--compete with scientific society journals? A longitudinal, retrospective cohort analysis of 13,223 articles (5999 treatment, 7224 control) published in 14 society-run biomedical research journals in nutrition, experimental biology, physiology, and radiology between February 2008 and January 2011 reveals a 21.4% reduction in full-text hypertext markup language (HTML) article downloads and a 13.8% reduction in portable document format (PDF) article downloads from the journals' websites when U.S. National Institutes of Health-sponsored articles (treatment) become freely available from the PubMed Central repository. In addition, the effect of PubMed Central on reducing PDF article downloads is increasing over time, growing at a rate of 1.6% per year. There was no longitudinal effect for full-text HTML downloads. While PubMed Central may be providing complementary access to readers traditionally underserved by scientific journals, the loss of article readership from the journal website may weaken the ability of the journal to build communities of interest around research papers, impede the communication of news and events to scientific society members and journal readers, and reduce the perceived value of the journal to institutional subscribers.
Keywords: digital repositories; downloads; open access; scientific publishing.
Figures



Similar articles
- The effect of public deposit of scientific articles on readership.Davis PM.Davis PM.Physiologist. 2012 Oct;55(5):161, 163-5.Physiologist. 2012.PMID:23155924
- Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial.Davis PM, Lewenstein BV, Simon DH, Booth JG, Connolly MJ.Davis PM, et al.BMJ. 2008 Jul 31;337:a568. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a568.BMJ. 2008.PMID:18669565Free PMC article.Clinical Trial.
- Status of open access in the biomedical field in 2005.Matsubayashi M, Kurata K, Sakai Y, Morioka T, Kato S, Mine S, Ueda S.Matsubayashi M, et al.J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Jan;97(1):4-11. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.1.002.J Med Libr Assoc. 2009.PMID:19159007Free PMC article.
- A bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature on Internet, video games, and cell phone addiction.Carbonell X, Guardiola E, Beranuy M, Bellés A.Carbonell X, et al.J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Apr;97(2):102-7. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.2.006.J Med Libr Assoc. 2009.PMID:19404500Free PMC article.Review.
- Science, institutional archives and open access: an overview and a pilot survey on the Italian cancer research institutions.Poltronieri E, Truccolo I, Di Benedetto C, Castelli M, Mazzocut M, Cognetti G.Poltronieri E, et al.J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Dec 20;29(1):168. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-168.J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010.PMID:21172002Free PMC article.Review.
Cited by
- Preserving the Open Access Benefits Pioneered by the Journal of Medical Internet Research and Discouraging Fraudulent Journals.Wyatt JC.Wyatt JC.J Med Internet Res. 2019 Dec 23;21(12):e16532. doi: 10.2196/16532.J Med Internet Res. 2019.PMID:31868652Free PMC article.
- Article-Level Metrics.Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Voronov AA, Maksaev AA, Kitas GD.Gasparyan AY, et al.J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Mar 22;36(11):e74. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e74.J Korean Med Sci. 2021.PMID:33754507Free PMC article.Review.
- Recent trends in biomedical informatics: a study based on JAMIA articles.Jiang X, Tse K, Wang S, Doan S, Kim H, Ohno-Machado L.Jiang X, et al.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Dec;20(e2):e198-205. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002429. Epub 2013 Nov 8.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013.PMID:24214018Free PMC article.
- Accessing biomedical literature in the current information landscape.Khare R, Leaman R, Lu Z.Khare R, et al.Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1159:11-31. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0709-0_2.Methods Mol Biol. 2014.PMID:24788259Free PMC article.Review.
- Is Biblioleaks inevitable?Dunn AG, Coiera E, Mandl KD.Dunn AG, et al.J Med Internet Res. 2014 Apr 22;16(4):e112. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3331.J Med Internet Res. 2014.PMID:24755534Free PMC article.
References
- U.S. National Institutes of Health (2009) National Institutes of Health Public Access; Retrieved fromhttp://publicaccess.nih.gov/
- Davis P. M. (2011) Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing. FASEB J. 25, 2129–2134 - PubMed
- CIBER Research Ltd. (2012) PEER Usage Study: randomised controlled trial results. CIBER Research Ltd., Newbury, UK: Retrieved fromhttp://www.peerproject.eu/fileadmin/media/reports/20120618_D5_3_PEER_Usa...
- Davis P. M. (2012) The effect of public deposit of scientific articles on readership. Physiologist 55, 161–165 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources