Volitional determinants and age-related decline in fecundability: a general population prospective cohort study in Denmark
- PMID:23517858
- PMCID: PMC3672329
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.040
Volitional determinants and age-related decline in fecundability: a general population prospective cohort study in Denmark
Abstract
Objective: To quantify the natural decline in fecundability by age and assess the effect of selected volitional factors.
Design: Prospective cohort study of women attempting conception.
Setting: Not applicable.
Participant(s): A total of 2,820 women without infertility, trying to conceive for less than 3 cycles at study entry.
Intervention(s): None.
Main outcome measure(s): Fecundability.
Result(s): Age had little effect on fecundability except for women 35-40 years, for whom it was 0.77 relative to women aged 20-24 years. Male age showed a similar but smaller decrease, declining to 0.95 for men aged 35-39 years. The effect of age differed for parous and nulliparous women, with the latter experiencing much stronger age-related declines relative to fecundability at age 20 years. Frequency of intercourse, use of nonhormonal birth control as the last method, and timing of intercourse, each had small effects on fecundability. Women who were in the high-fecundability categories for all three of these volitional factors had an estimated probability of conceiving of 88% (95% confidence interval 83%-93%). Unlike age, these factors represent individual choices that together can offset some of the age-related decline in fecundability.
Conclusion(s): Fecundability peaks around age 30 years, slightly earlier for nulliparous than for parous women, and then declines. The decline with age is more modest for men. Couples will experience a compounded effect of their separate age-related declines. At age 40 years, a couple's fecundability would be approximately half of what it was at age 30 years, but some of this decline can be counteracted by volitional factors affecting conception.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
We have no conflicts of interest to declare.
All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at
Figures



Similar articles
- Age and fecundability in a North American preconception cohort study.Wesselink AK, Rothman KJ, Hatch EE, Mikkelsen EM, Sørensen HT, Wise LA.Wesselink AK, et al.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;217(6):667.e1-667.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 14.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017.PMID:28917614Free PMC article.
- A prospective cohort study of a woman's own gestational age and her fecundability.Wildenschild C, Riis AH, Ehrenstein V, Hatch EE, Wise LA, Rothman KJ, Sørensen HT, Mikkelsen EM.Wildenschild C, et al.Hum Reprod. 2015 Apr;30(4):947-56. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev007. Epub 2015 Feb 11.Hum Reprod. 2015.PMID:25678570Free PMC article.
- Gravidity modifies the associations of age and spousal age difference with couple's fecundability: a large cohort study from China.Zhang Y, Zhang H, Zhao J, Zhao Y, Zhang J, Jiang L, Wang Y, Peng Z, Zhang Y, Jiao K, He T, Wang Q, Shen H, Zhang Y, Yan D, Ma X.Zhang Y, et al.Hum Reprod. 2024 Jan 5;39(1):201-208. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead209.Hum Reprod. 2024.PMID:37823182
- Reproductive potential in the older woman.Gindoff PR, Jewelewicz R.Gindoff PR, et al.Fertil Steril. 1986 Dec;46(6):989-1001. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49869-9.Fertil Steril. 1986.PMID:3536609Review.
- Fecundity and natural fertility in humans.Wood JW.Wood JW.Oxf Rev Reprod Biol. 1989;11:61-109.Oxf Rev Reprod Biol. 1989.PMID:2697833Review.
Cited by
- Age affects the association between socioeconomic status and infertility: a cross-sectional study.Chen X, Liang J, Yang Q, Huang J, Li L, Deng K.Chen X, et al.BMC Womens Health. 2023 Dec 19;23(1):675. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02680-x.BMC Womens Health. 2023.PMID:38115086Free PMC article.
- Investigation of the Predictive Factors of Diminished Ovarian Reserve in Women Aged Less Than 40 Years and Undergoing ICSI Cycle.Laqqan MM, Yassin MM.Laqqan MM, et al.Reprod Sci. 2023 Mar;30(3):873-882. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-01055-1. Epub 2022 Aug 24.Reprod Sci. 2023.PMID:36002711
- Socioeconomic status and fecundability in a Danish preconception cohort.Jørgensen MD, Mikkelsen EM, Hatch EE, Rothman KJ, Wise LA, Sørensen HT, Laursen ASD.Jørgensen MD, et al.Hum Reprod. 2023 Jun 1;38(6):1183-1193. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead077.Hum Reprod. 2023.PMID:37094974Free PMC article.
- Ovarian aging: mechanisms and intervention strategies.Zhu Z, Xu W, Liu L.Zhu Z, et al.Med Rev (2021). 2022 Nov 22;2(6):590-610. doi: 10.1515/mr-2022-0031. eCollection 2022 Dec.Med Rev (2021). 2022.PMID:37724254Free PMC article.Review.
- Return to pregnancy after contraceptive discontinuation to become pregnant: a pooled analysis of West and East African populations.Barden-O'Fallon J, Speizer IS, Calhoun LM, Moumouni NA.Barden-O'Fallon J, et al.Reprod Health. 2021 Jul 2;18(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01193-w.Reprod Health. 2021.PMID:34215261Free PMC article.
References
- Schwartz D, Mayaux MJ. Female fecundity as a function of age: results of artificial insemination in 2193 nulliparous women with azoospermic husbands. Federation CECOS. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:404–406. - PubMed
- Larsen U, Yan S. The age pattern of fecundability: an analysis of French Canadian and Hutterite birth histories. Biodemography and Social Biology. 2000;47:34–50. - PubMed
- Menken J, Trussell J, Larsen U. Age and infertility. Science. 1986;233:1389–1394. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Related information
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources