Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Atypon full text link Atypon Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Review
.2013 Mar;23(1):99-104.
doi: 10.7182/pit2013801.

Consent to organ donation: a review

Affiliations
Review

Consent to organ donation: a review

Laura A Siminoff et al. Prog Transplant.2013 Mar.

Abstract

Successful transplant medicine hinges on consent to deceased organ donation. Yet rates of consent remain suboptimal. To increase the availability of transplantable organs, several policy strategies along with a rich body of evidence aimed at identifying best practices for obtaining consent have accumulated. This review describes past and current policies and practices, presents evidence illustrating the impact of these policies and practices on consent, and summarizes future directions and recommendations for the field. Key findings include evidence that although past policies such as required request have been unsuccessful, the recent policy, first-person authorization, shows promise. Additionally, practices such as decoupling and detailed discussions of brain death are unwarranted. On the other hand, the Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaboration was successful. We also underscore the impact of alternative procedures such as donation after cardiac death. Last, effective communication that is delivered by trained, caring requesters at the appropriate time, in a supportive environment, and allows sufficient time for families to make an informed decision, optimizes the request process. Organ procurement organizations' adoption of such request practices, implementation of evidence-based policies regarding donation after cardiac death, and further investigations of the medical basis for dual brain death examinations are recommended.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Consent to organ donation.
    Benjamin D.Benjamin D.Prog Transplant. 2014 Mar;24(1):6. doi: 10.7182/pit2014335.Prog Transplant. 2014.PMID:24598558No abstract available.

References

    1. United Network for Organ Sharing. OPTN DSA National Dashboard Report (Jan-Dec 2011).http://www.aopo.org/related-links-data-organ-donation-transplantation-a40. Accessed June 25, 2012.
    1. Siminoff LA, Mercer MB. Public policy, public opinion, and consent for organ donation. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2001; 10(4):377–386. - PubMed
    1. Nathan HM, Conrad SL, Held PJ, et al. Organ donation in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2003;3(suppl 4):29–40. - PubMed
    1. Ojo AO, Heinrichs D, Edmond JC, et al. Organ donation and utilization in the USA. Am J Transplant. 2004;4(suppl 9):27–37. - PubMed
    1. Sung RS, Galloway J, Tuttle-Newhall JE, et al. Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 1997–2006. Am J Transplant. 2008;8(4 pt 2):922–934. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Atypon full text link Atypon Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp