Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Multicenter Study
.2013 Jan;101(1):38-46.
doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.101.1.007.

The value of library and information services in patient care: results of a multisite study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The value of library and information services in patient care: results of a multisite study

Joanne Gard Marshall et al. J Med Libr Assoc.2013 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: The research conducted a large-scale, multisite study on the value and impact of library and information services on patient care.

Methods: THE STUDY USED: (1) 2 initial focus groups of librarians; (2) a web-based survey of physicians, residents, and nurses at 56 library sites serving 118 hospitals; and (3) 24 follow-up telephone interviews. Survey respondents were asked to base their responses on a recent incident in which they had sought information for patient care.

Results: Of the 16,122 survey respondents, 3/4 said that they had definitely or probably handled aspects of the patient care situation differently as a result of the information. Among the reported changes were advice given to the patient (48%), diagnosis (25%), and choice of drugs (33%), other treatment (31%), and tests (23%). Almost all of the respondents (95%) said the information resulted in a better informed clinical decision. Respondents reported that the information allowed them to avoid the following adverse events: patient misunderstanding of the disease (23%), additional tests (19%), misdiagnosis (13%), adverse drug reactions (13%), medication errors (12%), and patient mortality (6%).

Conclusions: Library and information resources were perceived as valuable, and the information obtained was seen as having an impact on patient care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Marshall JG. The impact of the hospital library on clinical decision making: the Rochester study. Bull Med Lib Assoc. 1992 Apr;80(2):169–78. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Israel BA, Eng E, Schulz AJ, Parker EA. Methods in community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2005.
    1. Dunn K, Brewer K, Marshall JG, Sollenberger J. Measuring the value and impact of health sciences libraries: planning an update and replication of the Rochester study. J Med Lib Assoc. 2009 Oct;97(4):308–12. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.4.016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sievert M, Burhans D, Ward D, Jones BJ, Bandy M, Carlson J, Decker M, Henderson H. The value of health sciences library resources and services to health care providers in medium and large communities across two mid-continental states. J Hosp Lib. 2011 Apr;11(2):140–57.
    1. Jemison K, Poletti E, Schneider J, Clark N, Stone RD. Measuring return on investment in VA libraries. J Hosp Lib. 2009 Oct;9:379–90.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp