Homosexuality as a consequence of epigenetically canalized sexual development
- PMID:23397798
- DOI: 10.1086/668167
Homosexuality as a consequence of epigenetically canalized sexual development
Abstract
Male and female homosexuality have substantial prevalence in humans. Pedigree and twin studies indicate that homosexuality has substantial heritability in both sexes, yet concordance between identical twins is low and molecular studies have failed to find associated DNA makers. This paradoxical pattern calls for an explanation. We use published data on fetal androgen signaling and gene regulation via nongenetic changes in DNA packaging (epigenetics) to develop a new model for homosexuality. It is well established that fetal androgen signaling strongly influences sexual development. We show that an unappreciated feature of this process is reduced androgen sensitivity in XX fetuses and enhanced sensitivity in XY fetuses, and that this difference is most feasibly mused by numerous sex-specific epigenetic modifications ("epi-marks") originating in embryonic stem cells. These epi-marks buffer XX fetuses from masculinization due to excess fetal androgen exposure and similarly buffer XY fetuses from androgen underexposure. Extant data indicates that individual epi-marks influence some but not other sexually dimorphic traits, vary in strength across individuals, and are produced during ontogeny and erased between generations. Those that escape erasure will steer development of the sexual phenotypes they influence in a gonad-discordant direction in opposite sex offspring, mosaically feminizing XY offspring and masculinizing XX offspring. Such sex-specific epi-marks are sexually antagonistic (SA-epi-marks) because they canalize sexual development in the parent that produced them, but contribute to gonad-trait discordances in opposite-sex offspring when unerased. In this model, homosexuality occurs when stronger-than-average SA-epi-marks (influencing sexual preference) from an opposite-sex parent escape erasure and are then paired with a weaker-than-average de novo sex-specific epi-marks produced in opposite-sex offspring. Our model predicts that homosexuality is part of a wider phenomenon in which recently evolved androgen-influenced traits commonly display gonad-trait discordances at substantial frequency, and that the molecular feature underlying most homosexuality is not DNA polymorphism(s), but epi-marks that evolved to canalize sexual dimorphic development that sometimes carryover across generations and contribute to gonad-trait discordances in opposite-sex descendants.
Similar articles
- Sexual partner preference in animals and humans.Balthazart J.Balthazart J.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Aug;115:34-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.03.024. Epub 2020 May 22.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020.PMID:32450091Free PMC article.Review.
- Sexually antagonistic epigenetic marks that canalize sexually dimorphic development.Rice WR, Friberg U, Gavrilets S.Rice WR, et al.Mol Ecol. 2016 Apr;25(8):1812-22. doi: 10.1111/mec.13490. Epub 2016 Jan 19.Mol Ecol. 2016.PMID:26600375
- Homosexuality via canalized sexual development: a testing protocol for a new epigenetic model.Rice WR, Friberg U, Gavrilets S.Rice WR, et al.Bioessays. 2013 Sep;35(9):764-70. doi: 10.1002/bies.201300033. Epub 2013 Jul 19.Bioessays. 2013.PMID:23868698Free PMC article.
- Adult erotosexual status and fetal hormonal masculinization and demasculinization: 46,XX congenital virilizing adrenal hyperplasia and 46,XY androgen-insensitivity syndrome compared.Money J, Schwartz M, Lewis VG.Money J, et al.Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1984;9(4):405-14. doi: 10.1016/0306-4530(84)90048-9.Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1984.PMID:6514935
- [Influence of genetic factors on human sexual orientation. Review].Rodríguez-Larralde A, Paradisi I.Rodríguez-Larralde A, et al.Invest Clin. 2009 Sep;50(3):377-91.Invest Clin. 2009.PMID:19961060Review.Spanish.
Cited by
- Sexual partner preference in animals and humans.Balthazart J.Balthazart J.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Aug;115:34-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.03.024. Epub 2020 May 22.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020.PMID:32450091Free PMC article.Review.
- Human homosexuality: a paradigmatic arena for sexually antagonistic selection?Camperio Ciani A, Battaglia U, Zanzotto G.Camperio Ciani A, et al.Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015 Jan 29;7(4):a017657. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017657.Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015.PMID:25635045Free PMC article.Review.
- Sex-specific trans-regulatory variation on the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome.Stocks M, Dean R, Rogell B, Friberg U.Stocks M, et al.PLoS Genet. 2015 Feb 13;11(2):e1005015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005015. eCollection 2015 Feb.PLoS Genet. 2015.PMID:25679222Free PMC article.
- Associations of Bisexuality and Homosexuality with Handedness and Footedness: A Latent Variable Analysis Approach.Tran US, Kossmeier M, Voracek M.Tran US, et al.Arch Sex Behav. 2019 Jul;48(5):1451-1461. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1346-9. Epub 2018 Nov 29.Arch Sex Behav. 2019.PMID:30498915Free PMC article.
- A broader cultural view is necessary to study the evolution of sexual orientation.Savolainen V, Bailey NW, Diamond L, Swift-Gallant A, Gavrilets S, Raymond M, Verweij KJH.Savolainen V, et al.Nat Ecol Evol. 2024 Feb;8(2):181-183. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02273-9.Nat Ecol Evol. 2024.PMID:38191835No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical