Arrests of and forced interventions on pregnant women in the United States, 1973-2005: implications for women's legal status and public health
- PMID:23262772
- DOI: 10.1215/03616878-1966324
Arrests of and forced interventions on pregnant women in the United States, 1973-2005: implications for women's legal status and public health
Abstract
In November 2011, the citizens of Mississippi voted down Proposition 26, a "personhood" measure that sought to establish separate constitutional rights for fertilized eggs, embryos, and fetuses. This proposition raised the question of whether such measures could be used as the basis for depriving pregnant women of their liberty through arrests or forced medical interventions. Over the past four decades, descriptions of selected subsets of arrests and forced interventions on pregnant women have been published. Such cases, however, have never been systematically identified and documented, nor has the basis for the deprivations of liberty been comprehensively examined. In this article we report on 413 cases from 1973 to 2005 in which a woman's pregnancy was a necessary factor leading to attempted and actual deprivations of a woman's physical liberty. First, we describe key characteristics of the cases and the women, including socioeconomic status and race. Second, we investigate the legal claims made to justify the arrests, detentions, and forced interventions. Third, we explore the role played by health care providers. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings and the likely impact of personhood measures on pregnant women's liberty and on maternal, fetal, and child health.
Similar articles
- A new threat to pregnant women's autonomy.Johnsen D.Johnsen D.Hastings Cent Rep. 1987 Aug-Sep;17(4):33-40.Hastings Cent Rep. 1987.PMID:3667248
- Anti-abortion movement.Wilson K.Wilson K.Plan Parent Rev. 1985 Summer;5(2):4-6.Plan Parent Rev. 1985.PMID:12340405
- A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last.Siano JR.Siano JR.Womens Rights Law Report. 1998 Spring;19(3):279-92.Womens Rights Law Report. 1998.PMID:15871153No abstract available.
- Future fear: prenatal duties imposed by private parties.Solomon RI.Solomon RI.Am J Law Med. 1991;17(4):411-34.Am J Law Med. 1991.PMID:1812768Review.
- International human rights and women's reproductive health.Cook RJ.Cook RJ.Stud Fam Plann. 1993 Mar-Apr;24(2):73-86.Stud Fam Plann. 1993.PMID:8511808Review.
Cited by
- Abortion afterDobbs: Defendants, denials, and delays.Kimport K.Kimport K.Sci Adv. 2022 Sep 9;8(36):eade5327. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade5327. Epub 2022 Sep 7.Sci Adv. 2022.PMID:36070372Free PMC article.Review.
- Mothers Who Use Drugs: Closing the Gaps in Harm Reduction Response Amidst the Dual Epidemics of Overdose and Violence in a Canadian Urban Setting.Boyd J, Maher L, Austin T, Lavalley J, Kerr T, McNeil R.Boyd J, et al.Am J Public Health. 2022 Apr;112(S2):S191-S198. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306776.Am J Public Health. 2022.PMID:35349325Free PMC article.
- Epistemic Silences and Experiential Knowledge in Decisions After a First Cesarean: The case of a vaginal birth after cesarean calculator.Rubashkin N.Rubashkin N.Med Anthropol Q. 2023 Dec;37(4):341-353. doi: 10.1111/maq.12784. Epub 2023 Jul 17.Med Anthropol Q. 2023.PMID:37459454Free PMC article.
- Substance Use in Pregnancy: Identifying Stigma and Improving Care.Weber A, Miskle B, Lynch A, Arndt S, Acion L.Weber A, et al.Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2021 Nov 23;12:105-121. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S319180. eCollection 2021.Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2021.PMID:34849047Free PMC article.Review.
- Opioid use disorder incidence and treatment among incarcerated pregnant women in the United States: results from a national surveillance study.Sufrin C, Sutherland L, Beal L, Terplan M, Latkin C, Clarke JG.Sufrin C, et al.Addiction. 2020 Nov;115(11):2057-2065. doi: 10.1111/add.15030. Epub 2020 Mar 18.Addiction. 2020.PMID:32141128Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous